Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28821508›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

A novel income security intervention to address poverty in a primary care setting: a retrospective chart review.

Marcella K Jones, Gary Bloch, Andrew D Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Implementing social interventions in primary care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Framework for building primary care capacity to address the social determinants of health.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcella K JonesFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Gary BlochDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Andrew D PintoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-9347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the development and implementation of a novel income security intervention in primary care.

designA retrospective, descriptive chart review of all patients referred to the Income Security Heath Promotion service during the first year of the service (December 2013-December 2014).

settingA multisite interdisciplinary primary care organisation in inner city Toronto, Canada, serving over 40 000 patients.

participantsThe study population included 181 patients (53% female, mean age 48 years) who were referred to the Income Security Health Promotion service and engaged in care.

interventionThe Income Security Health Promotion service consists of a trained health promoter who provides a mixture of expert advice and case management to patients to improve income security. An advisory group, made up of physicians, social workers, a community engagement specialist and a clinical manager, supports the service. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic information, health status, referral information and encounter details were collected from patient charts.

resultsEncounters focused on helping patients with increasing their income (77.4%), reducing their expenses (58.6%) and improving their financial literacy (26.5%). The health promoter provided an array of services to patients, including assistance with taxes, connecting to community services, budgeting and accessing free services. The service could be improved with more specific goal setting, better links to other members of the healthcare team and implementing routine follow-up with each patient after discharge.

conclusionsIncome Security Health Promotion is a novel service within primary care to assist vulnerable patients with a key social determinant of health. This study is a preliminary look at understanding the functioning of the service. Future research will examine the impact of the Income Security Health Promotion service on income security, financial literacy, engagement with health services and health outcomes.

Indexed as

National Health ProgramsAdultCanadaFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFinancing, PersonalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansIncomeInsurance, HealthMaleMedical AssistanceMiddle AgedPatient Education as Topicpreventive medicineprimary carepublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID28821508
PMCPMC5724129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.