Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28821299›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2017

PknB remains an essential and a conserved target for drug development in susceptible and MDR strains of M. Tuberculosis.

Anamika Gupta, Sudhir K Pal, Divya Pandey, Najneen A Fakir, Sunita Rathod, Dhiraj Sinha, S SivaKumar, Pallavi Sinha, Mycal Periera, Shilpa Balgam and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potential therapeutic approaches for a sleeping pathogen: tuberculosis a case for bioinorganic chemistry.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anamika GuptaDepartment of Molecular Biology, National AIDS Research Institute, 73 G MIDC, Bhosari, Pune, 411 026, India.
Sudhir K PalDepartment of Molecular Biology, National AIDS Research Institute, 73 G MIDC, Bhosari, Pune, 411 026, India.
Divya PandeyDepartment of Molecular Biology, National AIDS Research Institute, 73 G MIDC, Bhosari, Pune, 411 026, India.
Najneen A FakirDepartment of Molecular Biology, National AIDS Research Institute, 73 G MIDC, Bhosari, Pune, 411 026, India.
Sunita RathodDepartment of Molecular Biology, National AIDS Research Institute, 73 G MIDC, Bhosari, Pune, 411 026, India.
Dhiraj SinhaDepartment of Bioinformatics, IIDS, Nehru Science Center, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 211002, India.
S SivaKumarNational Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No.1, Mayor Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600 031, India.
Pallavi SinhaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, India.
Mycal PerieraDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Pathology, National AIDS Research Institute, 73 G MIDC Bhosari, Pune, 411026, India.
Shilpa BalgamIntermediate Reference Laboratory State TB Training and Demonstration Centre (STDC) Pune, Pune, 411027, India.
Gomathi SekarNational Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No.1, Mayor Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600 031, India.
K R UmaDeviNational Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No.1, Mayor Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai, 600 031, India.
Shampa AnupurbaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221 005, India.
Vijay NemaDepartment of Molecular Biology, National AIDS Research Institute, 73 G MIDC, Bhosari, Pune, 411 026, India. dr.vijaynema@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-9397
National AIDS Research Institute · INNational Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · INResearch & Development Establishment (Engrs.) · INUniversity of Allahabad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) protein kinase B (PknB) which is now proved to be essential for the growth and survival of M.tb, is a transmembrane protein with a potential to be a good drug target. However it is not known if this target remains conserved in otherwise resistant isolates from clinical origin. The present study describes the conservation analysis of sequences covering the inhibitor binding domain of PknB to assess if it remains conserved in susceptible and resistant clinical strains of mycobacteria picked from three different geographical areas of India.

methodsA total of 116 isolates from North, South and West India were used in the study with a variable profile of their susceptibilities towards streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and ofloxacin. Isolates were also spoligotyped in order to find if the conservation pattern of pknB gene remain consistent or differ with different spoligotypes. The impact of variation as found in the study was analyzed using Molecular dynamics simulations.

resultsThe sequencing results with 115/116 isolates revealed the conserved nature of pknB sequences irrespective of their susceptibility status and spoligotypes. The only variation found was in one strains wherein pnkB sequence had G to A mutation at 664 position translating into a change of amino acid, Valine to Isoleucine. After analyzing the impact of this sequence variation using Molecular dynamics simulations, it was observed that the variation is causing no significant change in protein structure or the inhibitor binding.

conclusionsHence, the study endorses that PknB is an ideal target for drug development and there is no pre-existing or induced resistance with respect to the sequences involved in inhibitor binding. Also if the mutation that we are reporting for the first time is found again in subsequent work, it should be checked with phenotypic profile before drawing the conclusion that it would affect the activity in any way. Bioinformatics analysis in our study says that it has no significant effect on the binding and hence the activity of the protein.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEthambutolGenetic VariationHumansIndiaIsoniazidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMitoxantroneMolecular Docking SimulationMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisOfloxacinPhenotypeAntitubercular AgentsDNA, BacterialEthambutolIsoniazidMitoxantroneOfloxacinPknB protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRifampinStreptomycinConservationM. tuberculosisMultidrug resistantMutationPknBSequencing

Identifiers

PMID28821299
PMCPMC5562987
OpenAlexW2745863980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.