Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28821229›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2017

Mechanisms of peripheral phylogeographic divergence in the indo-Pacific: lessons from the spiny lobster Panulirus homarus.

Ahmad Farhadi, Andrew G Jeffs, Hamid Farahmand, Thankappan Sarasam Rejiniemon, Greg Smith, Shane D Lavery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seascape genetics of the spiny lobsterEcology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmad FarhadiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. farhadia63@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8282-4825
Andrew G JeffsInstitute of Marine Science and School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hamid FarahmandDepartment of Fisheries and Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Thankappan Sarasam RejiniemonDepartment of Botany and Biotechnology, AJ college of Science and Technology, Kerala, India.
Greg SmithInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Shane D LaverySchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing recognition of the concordance between marine biogeographic and phylogeographic boundaries. However, it is still unclear how population-level divergence translates into species-level divergence, and what are the principal factors that first initiate that divergence, and then maintain reproductive isolation. This study examines the likely forces driving population and lineage divergences in the broadly-distributed Indo-Pacific spiny lobster Panulirus homarus, which has peripheral divergent lineages in the west and east. The study focuses particularly on the West Indian Ocean, which is emerging as a region of unexpected diversity. Mitochondrial control region (mtCR) and COI sequences as well as genotypes of 9 microsatellite loci were examined in 410 individuals from 17 locations grouped into 7 regions from South Africa in the west, and eastward across to Taiwan and the Marquesas Islands. Phylogenetic and population-level analyses were used to test the significance and timing of divergences and describe the genetic relationships among populations.

resultsAnalyses of the mtCR revealed high levels of divergence among the seven regions (Ф

conclusionsThe divergence of peripheral lineages in the west and east of the species' range appear to have been initiated and maintained by very different processes. The pattern of mitochondrial and nuclear divergence of the western lineage, implicates processes of parapatric isolation, secondary contact and introgression, and suggests possible maintenance through adaptation and behavioural reproductive isolation. In contrast, the eastern lineage appears to have diverged through a rare colonisation event, maintained through long-term isolation, and matches expectations of the core-periphery hypothesis. The process of active peripheral speciation may be a common force in the Indo-Pacific that helps drive some of the regions' recognized biogeographic boundaries.

Indexed as

PhylogeographyAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialGeographyHaplotypesIndian OceanMicrosatellite RepeatsPacific OceanPalinuridaePhylogenyPrincipal Component AnalysisSpecies SpecificityDNA, MitochondrialIndo-West PacificLarval dispersalMarine biogeographyMicrosatellitesmtDNAPanulirusPeripheral speciationPhylogeographyWest Indian Ocean

Identifiers

PMID28821229
PMCPMC5563042
OpenAlexW2748509998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.