ArticleOncology nursing forum2017
The Role of Oncology Nurses in Discussing Clinical Trials.
Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Culturally Adapted Shared Decision-Making Tool for Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in China: A Nurse-Led Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Exploring research engagement among nurses in a Magnet®-recognized cancer center: An analysis of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and influencing factors.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- Article
- Development of a Japanese Scale that Evaluates the Level of Nursing Support Provided to Patients for Decision-Making in Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- Knowledge and perception of health-care professionals on clinical trials in India: A pan-Indian cross-sectional survey.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Current status and priorities of paediatric oncology nursing in Africa: a synthesis of perspectives from SIOP Africa nurses.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- Educational Needs in Oncology Nursing: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Impact of an Online Training Program About Cancer Clinical Trials on Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs, and Behavior.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Engaging Patients with Late-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Shared Decision Making about Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Randomized trial of a web-based nurse education intervention to increase discussion of clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021Article
- A National Study of Oncology Nurses Discussing Cancer Clinical Trials With Patients.Western journal of nursing research · 2019Article
- Communication Training: Needs Among Oncology Nurses Across the Cancer Continuum.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2019Article
- Importance of incorporating measures of attitude in planning and evaluating nursing education.Journal of nursing education and practice · 2019Article
- E-Clinical Trials: The Future of Clinical Trials and How Nurses Can Be Involved.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
- Recruitment Strategies for Nurse Enrollment in an Online Study.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectivesTo describe oncology nurses' experiences discussing clinical trials with their patients, and to assess barriers to these discussions. . RESEARCH APPROACH: A qualitative study designed to elicit narratives from oncology nurses. .
settingCommunity- and academic-based oncology clinics throughout the United States. .
participants33 oncology nurses involved in direct patient care in community-based and large hospital-based settings. The sample was drawn from members of the Oncology Nursing Society. . METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: In-depth interviews were conducted and analyzed using a immersion/crystallization approach to identify themes and patterns. The analyses highlight specific issues, examples, and contexts that present challenges to clinical trial discussions with patients. .
findingsOncology nurses view their roles as patient educators and advocates to be inclusive of discussion of clinical trials. Barriers to such discussions include lack of knowledge and strategies for addressing patients' common misconceptions and uncertainty about the timing of discussions. .
interpretationThese data indicate that enabling nurses to actively engage patients in discussions of clinical trials requires educational interventions to build self-efficacy and close knowledge gaps. . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses can play a critical role in advancing cancer care by supporting patients in decision making about clinical trial participation. This will require training and education to build their knowledge, reduce barriers, and increase their self-efficacy to fulfill this responsibility in various clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.