Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28820286›Full record

ReviewAutophagy2017

Autophagy-monitoring and autophagy-deficient mice.

Akiko Kuma, Masaaki Komatsu, Noboru Mizushima

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autophagy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 207 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
207citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

207 citing papers in PubMed, 321 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Eccentric Exercise and Muscle Damage: An Introductory Guide.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Inflammasomes and autophagy in cancer: unlocking targeted therapies.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akiko Kumaa Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo , Tokyo , Japan.
Masaaki Komatsuc Department of Biochemistry , Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences , Niigata , Japan.
Noboru Mizushimaa Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo , Tokyo , Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-6444
The University of Tokyo · JPNiigata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of yeast autophagy-related (ATG) genes and subsequent identification of their homologs in other organisms have enabled researchers to investigate physiological functions of macroautophagy/autophagy using genetic techniques. Specific identification of autophagy-related structures is important to evaluate autophagic activity, and specific ablation of autophagy-related genes is a critical means to determine the requirements of autophagy. Here, we review currently available mouse models, particularly focusing on autophagy (and mitophagy) indicator models and systemic autophagy-related gene-knockout mouse models.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyAutophagy-Related ProteinsHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMitochondriaMitophagySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal TransductionAutophagy-Related Proteinsautophagyknockout mousemitophagyreporter mouseselective autophagy

Identifiers

PMID28820286
PMCPMC5640176
OpenAlexW2750257699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.