ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2017
Twice-Daily vs. Once-Daily Dosing with 0.075% Bromfenac in DuraSite: Outcomes from a 14-Day Phase 2 Study.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01190878 (A Randomized Double-masked 14-day Study to Compare the Ocular Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Differing Dosing Regimens of ISV-303 to Vehicle and Xibrom™ in Post Cataract Surgery Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Double-masked 14-day Study to Compare the Ocular Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Differing Dosing Regimens of ISV-303 to Vehicle and Xibrom™ in Post Cataract Surgery Volunteers
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Roles of biomaterials in modulating the innate immune response in ocular therapy.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBromfenac is a well-known topical ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that is commercialized in the USA and other regions of the world. A new formulation, 0.075% bromfenac in DuraSite®, was developed to treat postoperative inflammation and reduce pain in patients who have undergone cataract surgery. We hypothesized that efficacy and safety would be enhanced with twice-daily (BID) dosing compared to once-daily (QD) dosing.
methodsThis was a multicenter, double-masked, comparative study in which 40 and 45 subjects were randomized to groups receiving BID dosing and QD dosing, respectively. Subjects self-instilled the study drug for 14 days postoperative and were followed for an additional 2-week evaluation phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects with an anterior chamber cell (ACC) grade of 0 at day 15.
resultsA total of 45 subjects had cleared ACC (grade "0") at day 15, of whom 21 were in the BID group (52.5%) and 24 were in the QD group (53.5%). A secondary analysis found 7/40 (17.5%) subjects in the BID group and 10/45 (22.2%) subjects in the QD group achieved an ACC grade of 0 at day 8. There were more adverse events in the QD group (n = 16) than in the BID group (n = 12).
conclusionSimilar outcomes were observed for subjects using Bromfenac 0.075% in DuraSite® in the BID and QD dosing regimens for the treatment of post-cataract surgery inflammation.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01190878.
fundingInSite Vision (now a division of Sun Pharma).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.