Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819914›Full record

SynthesisDysphagia2018

Psychometric Characteristics of Non-instrumental Swallowing and Feeding Assessments in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN.

Renée Speyer, Reinie Cordier, Lauren Parsons, Deborah Denman, Jae-Hyun Kim

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic accuracy of the gugging swallowing screen (GUSS) in detecting aspiration and dysphagia in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Paediatric oral sensorimotor interventions for chewing dysfunction: A scoping review.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Renée SpeyerCollege of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. renee.speyer@jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2828-8897
Reinie CordierSchool of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, WESTERN, Australia.
Lauren ParsonsSchool of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, WESTERN, Australia.
Deborah DenmanCollege of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Jae-Hyun KimCollege of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Curtin University · AUJames Cook University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As early diagnosis of swallowing and feeding difficulties in infants and children is of utmost importance, there is a need to evaluate the quality of the psychometric properties of pediatric assessments of swallowing and feeding. A systematic review was performed summarizing the psychometric properties of non-instrumental assessments for swallowing and feeding difficulties in pediatrics; no data were identified for the remaining twelve assessments. The COSMIN taxonomy and checklist were used to evaluate the methodological quality of 23 publications on psychometric properties. For each assessment, an overall quality score for each measurement property was determined. As psychometric data proved incomplete, conflicting or indeterminate for all assessments, only preliminary conclusions could be drawn; the most robust assessment based on current data is the dysphagia disorder survey (DDS). However, further research is needed to provide additional information on all psychometric properties for all assessments.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCineradiographyDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersHumansInfantReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildDysphagiaQuestionnaireReliabilityReviewValidity

Identifiers

PMID28819914
OpenAlexW2749275440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.