ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2018
In Vitro Selection and Identification of Potential Probiotics Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotic potential of autochthonous Enterobacter mori ASP8 and Bacillus stercoris ASP10 isolated from gut microbiota of healthy stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Host-associatedVeterinary world · 2026Article
- Isolation and characterization of indigenous probiotic bacteria from wild Nile tilapia (Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Bioactivities and Immunomodulatory Potential of Postbiotics Derived from Bacillus subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens for Aquaculture.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Three Different Probiotics on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Microbiota in Grass Carp (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Improving the survival under gastric conditions of a potential multistrain probiotic produced in co-culture.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Encapsulation improves viability and stability of spray-dried Lactococcus lactis A12 for inclusion in fish feed.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Indigenous ProbioticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Probiotic Potential of the Anaerobic BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Effects of dietaryFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Intestine of Freshwater Fishes and Elucidation of Probiotic Potential for Aquaculture Application.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Article
- Influence of Symbiotic Probiont Strains on the Growth of Amphora and Chlorella and Its Potential Protections Against Vibrio spp. in Artemia.Current microbiology · 2021Article
- Isolation, Identification, and Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria with Probiotic Potential in Silage of Different Species of Forage Plants, Cocoa Beans, and Artisanal Salami.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Article
- Substrate preferences, phylogenetic and biochemical properties of proteolytic bacteria present in the digestive tract of Nile tilapia (AIMS microbiology · 2021Article
- Effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Quorum Quenching Properties and Probiotic Potentials of Intestinal Associated Bacteria in Asian Sea BassMarine drugs · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fish gut bacteria can be used as probiotics for aquaculture. The aim of this study is to screen and identify beneficial probiotic bacteria from the gut of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Nine out of one hundred thirty-five isolates were non-pathogenic through intraperitoneal injection and had antibacterial activities with at least a strain from the five isolated fish pathogens, Aeromonas sobria, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, and Staphylococcus aureus. Further tests showed that such isolates can survive in the presence of high bile concentration (10%) and at different acidic pH values. A strains (14HT) was sensitive to all selected antibiotics, two strains were (9HT and 11HT) resistant to streptomycin and three strains (9HT, 11HT and 38HT) had resistance to two antibiotics. Four isolates (11HT, 33HT, 38HT and 41HT) had an amylase and a protease activities and one strain (47HT) showed only amylase activity. Based on 16S rRNA gene analysis, the isolated strains were identified as follows: Lactococcus lactis (8HT, 9HT, 11HT and 33HT); Enterococcus faecalis (14HT), Lysinibacillus sp. (38HT) and Citrobacter freundii (39HT, 41HT and 47HT).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.