ArticleRheumatology international2017
Validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in patients with early scleroderma.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virus-Induced MicroRNA Modulation and Systemic Sclerosis Disease.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Incidence and prevalence of systemic sclerosis in Thailand in year 2017-2020: a database from the Ministry of Public Health.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Performance of the Revised Classification Criteria for Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Their Overlap Syndromes.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: Why Rheumatologist-Pulmonologist Collaboration Is Essential.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Blue toe syndrome as a first sign of systemic sclerosis.BMJ case reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to validate the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in patients with SSc, including patients with early SSc. Fifty-six consecutive patients with early SSc (2001 LeRoy and Medsger criteria), 122 patients with established SSc (1980 ACR classification criteria), and 141 patients with SSc-like disorders were included in this cross-sectional study. The diagnostic performance of the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria was compared with the 1980 ACR criteria in several subsets of patients. The performance of individual variables was also obtained. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and optimal cut-off values were computed. The sensitivity and specificity in the whole cohort of 178 SSc patients were 77.6 and 98.5%, respectively, using the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria and 68.5 and 100%, respectively, using the 1980 ACR criteria. Twenty-eight percent of the patients with early SSc met the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria. Among the patients with early SSc, 53% of those who had Raynaud's phenomenon, abnormal capillaroscopy and positive SSc-related antibodies met the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria. The area under the ROC curve was 0.975 (95% confidence interval 0.962-0.987). The best cut-off value for the total score was ≥8 (sensitivity 82%; specificity 97.9%). The individual variables with the highest specificity values were proximal skin thickening, sclerodactyly (specificity 100%), telangiectasia and SSc-related antibodies (specificity 98.6%). Raynaud's phenomenon had the best sensitivity (99.4%) but had low specificity (4.2%). In conclusion, the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria showed high accuracy and increased sensitivity in the classification of patients with early SSc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28819792What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.