Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819792›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2017

Validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in patients with early scleroderma.

Farley Carvalho Araújo, Cíntia Zumstein Camargo, Cristiane Kayser

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farley Carvalho AraújoRheumatology Division, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu 740, 3º andar, São Paulo, SP, 04023-062, Brazil.
Cíntia Zumstein CamargoRheumatology Division, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu 740, 3º andar, São Paulo, SP, 04023-062, Brazil.
Cristiane KayserRheumatology Division, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu 740, 3º andar, São Paulo, SP, 04023-062, Brazil. cristiane.kayser@unifesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-5305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in patients with SSc, including patients with early SSc. Fifty-six consecutive patients with early SSc (2001 LeRoy and Medsger criteria), 122 patients with established SSc (1980 ACR classification criteria), and 141 patients with SSc-like disorders were included in this cross-sectional study. The diagnostic performance of the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria was compared with the 1980 ACR criteria in several subsets of patients. The performance of individual variables was also obtained. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and optimal cut-off values were computed. The sensitivity and specificity in the whole cohort of 178 SSc patients were 77.6 and 98.5%, respectively, using the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria and 68.5 and 100%, respectively, using the 1980 ACR criteria. Twenty-eight percent of the patients with early SSc met the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria. Among the patients with early SSc, 53% of those who had Raynaud's phenomenon, abnormal capillaroscopy and positive SSc-related antibodies met the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria. The area under the ROC curve was 0.975 (95% confidence interval 0.962-0.987). The best cut-off value for the total score was ≥8 (sensitivity 82%; specificity 97.9%). The individual variables with the highest specificity values were proximal skin thickening, sclerodactyly (specificity 100%), telangiectasia and SSc-related antibodies (specificity 98.6%). Raynaud's phenomenon had the best sensitivity (99.4%) but had low specificity (4.2%). In conclusion, the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria showed high accuracy and increased sensitivity in the classification of patients with early SSc.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedScleroderma, SystemicACR/EULAR criteriaDiagnosisSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.