Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819737›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2018

Further Controversies About Brain Tissue Oxygenation Pressure-Reactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Morten Andresen, Joseph Donnelly, Marcel Aries, Marianne Juhler, David Menon, Pja Hutchinson, Peter Smielewski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Morten AndresenDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK. andresen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3802-6033
Joseph DonnellyDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Marcel AriesDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Marianne JuhlerClinic of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David MenonDivision of Anesthesiology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Pja HutchinsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Peter SmielewskiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous monitoring of cerebral autoregulation is considered clinically useful due to its ability to warn against brain ischemic insults, which may translate to a relationship with adverse outcome. It is typically performed using the pressure reactivity index (PRx) based on mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure. A new ORx index based on brain tissue oxygenation and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) has been proposed that similarly allows for evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity. Conflicting results exist concerning its clinical utility.

methodsRetrospective analysis was performed in 85 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). ORx was calculated using three time windows of 5, 20, and 60 min. Correlation coefficients and individual "optimal CPP" (CPP

resultsCorrelation coefficients for all comparisons between PRx and ORx indicated poor association between these indices (range from -0.04 to 0.07). PRx was significantly lower in patients with good outcome (p = 0.01), while none of the ORx indices proved to be significantly different in the two outcome groups. Higher mortality related to average CPP < CPP

conclusionIn the TBI setting, ORx does not appear to correlate with vascular pressure reactivity as assessed with PRx. Its potential use for individualizing CPP thresholds remains unclear.

Indexed as

AdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHomeostasisHumansIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedNeurophysiological MonitoringOxygen ConsumptionRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCerebral autoregulationCerebral perfusion pressureCPPoptICPORxPRxTissue oxygenation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.