Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819707›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

Metastatic melanoma: prognostic factors and survival in patients with brain metastases.

E Frinton, D Tong, J Tan, G Read, V Kumar, S Kennedy, C Lim, R E Board

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Current Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastasis.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E FrintonUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
D TongLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.
J TanLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.
G ReadLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.
V KumarLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.
S KennedyLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.
C LimLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.
R E BoardLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK. Ruth.Board@lthtr.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-0823
Royal Preston Hospital · GBLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastases from malignant melanoma carry a poor prognosis. Novel systemic agents have improved overall survival (OS), but the value of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains uncertain. The melanoma-specific graded prognostic assessment (msGPA) provides useful prognostic information, but the relevance to the modern-day population has not been validated. Since 2011, 53 patients received treatment for brain metastases from malignant melanoma at the Rosemere Cancer Centre medical oncology clinic. Data were collated on demographic factors and survival. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors on univariate and multivariate analysis. OS from the date of diagnosis of brain metastases was 4.83 months (range 0.27-30.4 months). On univariate analysis, BRAF, performance status and msGPA were significant prognostic indicators for OS (p = 0.0056, p = 0.0039 and p = 0.0001 respectively). msGPA remained significant on multivariate analysis (p = 0.0006). OS for BRAF-positive patients receiving targeted treatment (n = 22) was significantly better than for BRAF-negative patients (n = 26), with median survival times of 8.2 and 3.7 months respectively (p = 0.0039, HR 2.36). SRS combined with systemic agents (n = 16) produced an OS of 13.5 months. Patients receiving WBRT alone (n = 21) had a poor prognosis (2.2 months). The msGPA remains a valid prognostic indicator in the era of novel systemic treatments for melanoma. BRAF-positive patients receiving targeted agents during their treatment had favorable survival outcomes. WBRT alone should be use with caution in the active management of melanoma brain metastases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBrain metastasesMetastatic melanomaRadiotherapySurvival

Identifiers

PMID28819707
PMCPMC5700221
OpenAlexW2747510197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.