ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2017
Surgical Treatment for Chronic Pancreatitis: Past, Present, and Future.
Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral Endothelium Corneum Gigeriae Galli Therapy for Pancreatic Duct Stones: A Prospective Cohort Study.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022Trial
- Outcomes of surgical treatment in chronic pancreatitis - a single centre study.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2026Article
- Challenges of Managing Type 3c Diabetes in the Context of Pancreatic Resection, Cancer and Trauma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Evolving Technique for Puestow-Type Procedure for Chronic Pancreatitis: The Combined Roux-en-Y Proximal End-to-Side and Distal Longitudinal Pancreatojejunostomy.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Surgery for chronic pancreatitis: the comparison of two high-volume centers reveals lack of a uniform operative management.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Disease duration before surgical resection for chronic pancreatitis impacts long-term outcome.Medicine · 2020Article
- From pancreatitis to Puestow: The winding path of cystic fibrosis.Journal of pediatric surgery case reports · 2020Article
- Clube Português do Pâncreas Recommendations for Chronic Pancreatitis: Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Treatment (Part II).GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Laparoscopic pancreatic neck transection and double pancreatico-jejunostomy, an alternative surgical approach to chronic pancreatitis.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pancreas was one of the last explored organs in the human body. The first surgical experiences were made before fully understanding the function of the gland. Surgical procedures remained less successful until the discovery of insulin, blood groups, and finally the possibility of blood donation. Throughout the centuries, the surgical approach went from radical resections to minimal resections or only drainage of the gland in comparison to an adequate resection combined with drainage procedures. Today, the well-known and standardized procedures are considered as safe due to the high experience of operating surgeons, the centering of pancreatic surgery in specialized centers, and optimized perioperative treatment. Although surgical procedures have become safer and more efficient than ever, the overall perioperative morbidity after pancreatic surgery remains high and management of postoperative complications stagnates. Current research focuses on the prevention of complications, optimizing the patient's general condition preoperatively and finding the appropriate timing for surgical treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.