Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819291›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A single-molecule assessment of the protective effect of DMSO against DNA double-strand breaks induced by photo-and γ-ray-irradiation, and freezing.

Masami Noda, Yue Ma, Yuko Yoshikawa, Tadayuki Imanaka, Toshiaki Mori, Masakazu Furuta, Tatsuaki Tsuruyama, Kenichi Yoshikawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masami NodaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, 610-0321, Japan.
Yue MaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, 610-0321, Japan.
Yuko YoshikawaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, 610-0321, Japan.
Tadayuki ImanakaResearch Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, 525-8577, Japan.
Toshiaki MoriGraduate School of Engineering, Department of Quantum and Radiation Technology, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, 599-8570, Japan.
Masakazu FurutaGraduate School of Engineering, Department of Quantum and Radiation Technology, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, 599-8570, Japan.
Tatsuaki TsuruyamaDrug Discovery and Medicine, Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Kenichi YoshikawaFaculty of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University, Kyoto, 610-0321, Japan. keyoshik@mail.doshisha.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2751-7136
Doshisha University · JPOsaka Prefecture University · JPKyoto University · JPRitsumeikan University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is widely used as a cryoprotectant for organs, tissues, and cell suspension in storage. In addition, DMSO is known to be a useful free radical scavenger and a radio-protectant. To date, many in vitro assays using cultured cells have been performed for analysing the protective effect of DMSO against genomic DNA damage; however, currently it has been rather difficult to detect DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in a quantitative manner. In the present study, we aimed to observe the extent of DNA damage by use of single molecular observation with a fluorescence microscope to evaluate DSBs induced by photo- and γ-ray-irradiation, or freeze/thawing in variable concentrations of DMSO. As a result, we found that 2% DMSO conferred the maximum protective effect against all of the injury sources tested, and these effects were maintained at higher concentrations. Further, DMSO showed a significantly higher protective effect against freezing-induced damage than against photo- and γ-ray-irradiation-induced damage. Our study provides significant data for the optimization of DNA cryopreservation with DMSO, as well as for the usage of DNA as the protective agent against the injuries caused by active oxygen and radiations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedFreezingGamma RaysKineticsMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalReproducibility of ResultsSingle Molecule ImagingCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideDNA

Identifiers

PMID28819291
PMCPMC5561226
OpenAlexW2743098695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.