Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819276›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A new mathematical model and experimental validation on foamy-oil flow in developing heavy oil reservoirs.

Pengcheng Liu, Zhenbao Mu, Wenhui Li, Yongbin Wu, Xiuluan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pengcheng LiuSchool of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, 29 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100083, China. lpc@cugb.edu.cn.
Zhenbao MuResearch Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, SINOPEC, 29 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100083, China.
Wenhui LiSchool of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, 29 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100083, China.
Yongbin WuResearch Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, 31 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100083, China.
Xiuluan LiResearch Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, 31 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To model foamy-oil flow in the development of heavy oil reservoirs, three depletion experiments were conducted with foamy oil treated as a pseudo-single-phase flow. In this pseudo single phase, dispersed bubbles are viewed as a part of the oil, and the redefined effective permeability varies with the changes of pressure depletion rate, oil viscosity, and gas saturation. A mathematical expression for the effective permeability was developed based on experiments, where the viscosity of foamy oil is assumed to be approximately equal to the saturated oil under equivalent conditions. The compressibility coefficient of foamy oil is treated as a volume-weighted compressibility coefficient of that of oil and gas phases. A new mathematical model for foamy-oil flow was proposed with consideration of foamy-oil supersaturation. To validate the mathematical model, the oil recovery and the production gas-oil ratio (GOR) calculated by the new model, conventional black oil model, supersaturation model and pseudo-bubble-point (PBP) model were all compared with those of the experimental data. The new model provided a substantially improved fit to the experimental data compared with the rest three models, which verifies the suitability of the mathematical model presented for simulating foamy-oil flow in the development of heavy oil reservoirs.

Identifiers

PMID28819276
PMCPMC5561122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.