Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819270›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Fungal community assemblage of different soil compartments in mangrove ecosystem.

Dinesh Sanka Loganathachetti, Anbu Poosakkannu, Sundararaman Muthuraman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PeerJ · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dinesh Sanka LoganathachettiDepartment of Marine Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, 620024, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anbu PoosakkannuUniversity of Jyvaskyla, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Jyvaskyla, Finland. anbu.a.poosakkannu@jyu.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-2579-150X
Sundararaman MuthuramanDepartment of Marine Biotechnology, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, 620024, Tamil Nadu, India. sundar@bdu.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fungal communities of different soil compartments in mangrove ecosystem are poorly studied. We sequenced the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions to characterize the fungal communities in Avicennia marina root-associated soils (rhizosphere and pneumatophore) and bulk soil compartments. The rhizosphere but not pneumatophore soil compartment had significantly lower fungal species richness than bulk soil. However, bulk soil fungal diversity (Shannon diversity index) was significantly higher than both pneumatophore and rhizosphere soil compartments. The different soil compartments significantly affected the fungal community composition. Pairwise sample analyses showed that bulk soil microbial community composition significantly different from rhizosphere and pneumatophore soil compartments. There was, however no significant difference observed between rhizosphere and pneumatophore soil fungal community composition and they shared relatively more OTUs between them. Further, there was a significant correlation observed between fungal community compositional changes and carbon or nitrogen availability of different soil compartments. These results suggest that few characteristics such as fungal richness and taxa abundance of rhizosphere and pneumatophore soil compartments were significantly different in mangrove ecosystem.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAvicenniaCarbonDNA, Ribosomal SpacerEcosystemFungiMycobiomeNitrogenPlant RootsRhizosphereSequence Analysis, DNASoilCarbonDNA, Ribosomal SpacerNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID28819270
PMCPMC5561109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.