Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28819228›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Convergent and divergent genetic changes in the genome of Chinese and European pigs.

Jing Wang, Huiying Zou, Lei Chen, Xi Long, Jing Lan, Wenjie Liu, Li Ma, Chao Wang, Xinyu Xu, Liming Ren and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phylogenetic Relations and High-Altitude Adaptation in Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Silencing of retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene RTL1 is the main cause for postimplantational failures in mammalian cloning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing WangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Huiying ZouState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Lei ChenChongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Xi LongChongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Jing LanChongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Wenjie LiuState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Li MaState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Chao WangDepartment of Computer and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xinyu XuSchool of Life sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Liming RenState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Zhenglong GuDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Ning LiState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xiaoxiang HuState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yaofeng ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China. yaofengzhao@cau.edu.cn.
Yiqiang ZhaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China. yiqiangz@cau.edu.cn.
China Agricultural University · CNChongqing Academy of Animal Science · CNTsinghua University · CNCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 10,000 BC, continuous human selection has led to intense genetic and phenotypic changes in pig (Sus scrofa) domestication. Through whole genome analysis of 257 individuals, we demonstrated artificial unidirectional and bidirectional selection as the primary force to shape the convergent and divergent changes between Chinese domestic pigs (CHD) and European domestic pigs (EUD). We identified 31 genes in unidirectional selection regions that might be related to fundamental domestication requirements in pigs. And these genes belong predominantly to categories related to the nervous system, muscle development, and especially to metabolic diseases. In addition, 35 genes, representing different breeding preference, were found under bidirectional selection for the distinct leanness and reproduction traits between CHD and EUD. The convergent genetic changes, contributing physical and morphological adaption, represent the common concerns on pig domestication. And the divergent genetic changes reflect distinct breeding goals between Chinese and European pigs. Using ITPR3, AHR and NMU as examples, we explored and validated how the genetic variations contribute to the phenotype changes.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomeAnimalsBreedingChinaEuropeGenetic MarkersGenomicsHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of ResultsSelection, GeneticStructure-Activity RelationshipSus scrofaGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID28819228
PMCPMC5561219
OpenAlexW2745070627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.