Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28818817›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2017

Insights From Flutracking: Thirteen Tips to Growing a Web-Based Participatory Surveillance System.

Craig Dalton, Sandra Carlson, Michelle Butler, Daniel Cassano, Stephen Clarke, John Fejsa, David Durrheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Craig DaltonHMRI, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2005-7835
Sandra CarlsonHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-4518
Michelle ButlerHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-3379
Daniel CassanoHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4438-6278
Stephen ClarkeChord Wizard Systems, Mayfield, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6312-982X
John FejsaHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8525-0671
David DurrheimHMRI, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9236-4861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flutracking is a weekly Web-based survey of influenza-like illness (ILI) in Australia that has grown from 400 participants in 2006 to over 26,000 participants every week in 2016. Flutracking monitors both the transmission and severity of ILI across Australia by documenting symptoms (cough, fever, and sore throat), time off work or normal duties, influenza vaccination status, laboratory testing for influenza, and health seeking behavior. Recruitment of Flutrackers commenced via health department and other organizational email systems, and then gradually incorporated social media promotion and invitations from existing Flutrackers to friends to enhance participation. Invitations from existing participants typically contribute to over 1000 new participants each year. The Flutracking survey link was emailed every Monday morning in winter and took less than 10 seconds to complete. To reduce the burden on respondents, we collected only a minimal amount of demographic and weekly data. Additionally, to optimize users' experiences, we maintained a strong focus on "obvious design" and repeated usability testing of naïve and current participants of the survey. In this paper, we share these and other insights on recruitment methods and user experience principles that have enabled Flutracking to become one of the largest online participatory surveillance systems in the world. There is still much that could be enhanced in Flutracking; however, we believe these principles could benefit others developing similar online surveillance systems.

Indexed as

epidemiologyinfluenzasurveillanceuser centered designWorld Wide Web

Identifiers

PMID28818817
PMCPMC5579323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.