Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28818113›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2017

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) entry is inhibited by serine protease inhibitor AEBSF when present during an early stage of infection.

Winke Van der Gucht, Annelies Leemans, Marjorie De Schryver, Annick Heykers, Guy Caljon, Louis Maes, Paul Cos, Peter L Delputte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Winke Van der GuchtLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Annelies LeemansLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marjorie De SchryverLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Annick HeykersLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Guy CaljonLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Louis MaesLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Paul CosLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Peter L DelputteLaboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. peter.delputte@uantwerpen.be.
University of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHost proteases have been shown to play important roles in many viral activities such as entry, uncoating, viral protein production and disease induction. Therefore, these cellular proteases are putative targets for the development of antivirals that inhibit their activity. Host proteases have been described to play essential roles in Ebola, HCV, HIV and influenza, such that specific protease inhibitors are able to reduce infection. RSV utilizes a host protease in its replication cycle but its potential as antiviral target is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of protease inhibitors on RSV infection.

methodsTo measure the sensitivity of RSV infection to protease inhibitors, cells were infected with RSV and incubated for 18 h in the presence or absence of the inhibitors. Cells were fixed, stained and studied using fluorescence microscopy.

resultsSeveral protease inhibitors, representing different classes of proteases (AEBSF, Pepstatin A, E-64, TPCK, PMSF and aprotinin), were tested for inhibitory effects on an RSV A2 infection of HEp-2 cells. Different treatment durations, ranging from 1 h prior to inoculation and continuing for 18 h during the assay, were evaluated. Of all the inhibitors tested, AEBSF and TPCK significantly decreased RSV infection. To ascertain that the observed effect of AEBSF was not a specific feature related to HEp-2 cells, A549 and BEAS-2B cells were also used. Similar to HEp-2, an almost complete block in the number of RSV infected cells after 18 h of incubation was observed and the effect was dose-dependent. To gain insight into the mechanism of this inhibition, AEBSF treatment was applied during different phases of an infection cycle (pre-, peri- and post-inoculation treatment). The results from these experiments indicate that AEBSF is mainly active during the early entry phase of RSV. The inhibitory effect was also observed with other RSV isolates A1998/3-2 and A2000/3-4, suggesting that this is a general feature of RSV.

conclusionRSV infection can be inhibited by broad serine protease inhibitors, AEBSF and TPCK. We confirmed that AEBSF inhibition is independent of the cell line used or RSV strain. The time point at which treatment with the inhibitor was most potent, was found to coincide with the expected moment of entry of the virion with the host cell.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAprotininCell LineCell SurvivalEndopeptidasesHumansKineticsLeucinePepstatinsRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsSerine Proteinase InhibitorsSulfonesTime FactorsTosylphenylalanyl Chloromethyl KetoneViral Proteins4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonylfluorideAprotininE 64EndopeptidasesLeucinepepstatinPepstatinsSerine Proteinase InhibitorsSulfonesTosylphenylalanyl Chloromethyl KetoneViral ProteinsAEBSFHost proteaseProtease inhibitorRSV

Identifiers

PMID28818113
PMCPMC5561636
OpenAlexW2749024169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.