Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28817954›Full record

ArticleASN neuro

Dissecting Amyloid Beta Deposition Using Distinct Strains of the Neurotropic Parasite Toxoplasma gondii as a Novel Tool.

Carla M Cabral, Kathryn E McGovern, Wes R MacDonald, Jenna Franco, Anita A Koshy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ASN neuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond Latency: ChronicBiomedicines · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Heliyon · 2021
    Review
  17. Reduction of Amyloid Burden by Proliferated Homeostatic Microglia inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carla M Cabral1 BIO5 Institute, 8041 University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-3538
Kathryn E McGovern1 BIO5 Institute, 8041 University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA.
Wes R MacDonald2 Undergraduate Biology Research Program, 8041 University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jenna Franco1 BIO5 Institute, 8041 University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA.
Anita A Koshy1 BIO5 Institute, 8041 University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Postdoctoral Training, Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG044402 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CAROL A. BARNES · 2016 to 2026
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS T32 AG044402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic and pathologic data suggest that amyloid beta (Aβ), produced by processing of the amyloid precursor protein, is a major initiator of Alzheimer's disease (AD). To gain new insights into Aβ modulation, we sought to harness the power of the coevolution between the neurotropic parasite Toxoplasma gondii and the mammalian brain. Two prior studies attributed Toxoplasma-associated protection against Aβ to increases in anti-inflammatory cytokines (TGF-β and IL-10) and infiltrating phagocytic monocytes. These studies only used one Toxoplasma strain making it difficult to determine if the noted changes were associated with Aβ protection or simply infection. To address this limitation, we infected a third human amyloid precursor protein AD mouse model (J20) with each of the genetically distinct, canonical strains of Toxoplasma (Type I, Type II, or Type III). We then evaluated the central nervous system (CNS) for Aβ deposition, immune cell responses, global cytokine environment, and parasite burden. We found that only Type II infection was protective against Aβ deposition despite both Type II and Type III strains establishing a chronic CNS infection and inflammatory response. Compared with uninfected and Type I-infected mice, both Type II- and Type III-infected mice showed increased numbers of CNS T cells and microglia and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, but neither group showed a >2-fold elevation of TGF-β or IL-10. These data suggest that we can now use our identification of protective (Type II) and nonprotective (Type III) Toxoplasma strains to determine what parasite and host factors are linked to decreased Aβ burden rather than simply with infection.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHippocampusHumansMacrophagesMice, TransgenicMicrogliaNeuroprotectionPlaque, AmyloidSpecies SpecificityT-LymphocytesAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAPP protein, humanCytokinesAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid betaneurodegenerationneuroprotectionToxoplasma

Identifiers

PMID28817954
PMCPMC5565021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.