Trial reportJAMA oncology2017
Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Updated Results From a Phase 1/2 Open-label Study.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 476 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of MEDI4736 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
Cabozantinib Plus Durvalumab in Patients With Advanced and Chemotherapy-treated Bladder Carcinoma, of Urothelial and Non-urothelial Histology: an Open-label, Single-centre, Phase 2, Single-arm Proof-of-concept Trial: ARCADIA Study
A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Phase II Study of Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy Combined With Oral Probiotics Compound (Biolosion) in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Who cites it
476 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 842 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of PD-1/L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Significance of PD-L1 in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Tumor-associated neutrophils suppress CD8British journal of cancer · 2024Pooled it
- The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy versus chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Transcriptomic datasets of cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Switch Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Pooled it
- Immune checkpoint inhibition for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: limitations and prospects: a systematic review.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Oncology: From Personalized Medicine to Public Health.The oncologist · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- PD-L1 testing in urothelial bladder cancer: essentials of clinical practice.World journal of urology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in PD-L1 selected or unselected patients vs. control group in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.Oncoimmunology · 2021Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant Sintilimab Combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Followed by Selective Bladder Sparing Surgery: A Phase 2 Trial.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Trial
- Improved efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with soluble EphB4-albumin in HPV-negative EphrinB2 positive head neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oncotarget · 2024Trial
- Perioperative Chemoimmunotherapy With Durvalumab for Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma: Primary Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase II Trial SAKK 06/17.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 study.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Durvalumab Plus Olaparib in Previously Untreated, Platinum-Ineligible Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase II Trial (BAYOU).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- MTAP deficiency creates an exploitable target for antifolate therapy in 9p21-loss cancers.Nature communications · 2022Trial
- Immunomodulation by durvalumab and pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
416 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe data reported herein were accepted for assessment by the US Food and Drug Administration for Biologics License Application under priority review to establish the clinical benefit of durvalumab as second-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC), resulting in its recent US approval.
objectiveTo report a planned update of the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients with locally advanced/metastatic UC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis is an ongoing phase 1/2 open-label study of 191 adult patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced/metastatic UC whose disease had progressed on, were ineligible for, or refused prior chemotherapy from 60 sites in 9 countries as reported herein.
interventionPatients were administered durvalumab intravenous infusion, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, for up to 12 months or until progression, starting another anticancer therapy, or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points were safety and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per blinded independent central review (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST], version 1.1).
resultsA total of 191 patients with UC had received treatment. As of October 24, 2016 (90-day update), the median follow-up was 5.78 months (range, 0.4-25.9 months). The median age of patients was 67.0 years and most were male (136 [71.2%]) and white (123 [71.1%]). All patients had stage 4 disease, and 190 (99.5%) had prior anticancer therapy (182 [95.3%] postplatinum). The ORR was 17.8% (34 of 191; 95% CI, 12.7%-24.0%), including 7 complete responses. Responses were early (median time to response, 1.41 months), durable (median duration of response not reached), and observed regardless of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (ORR, 27.6% [n = 27; 95% CI, 19.0%-37.5%] and 5.1% [n = 4; 95% CI, 1.4%-12.5%] in patients with high and low or negative expression of PD-L1, respectively). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-1.9 months) and 18.2 months (95% CI, 8.1 months to not estimable), respectively; the 1-year overall survival rate was 55% (95% CI, 44%-65%), as estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 13 patients (6.8%); grade 3/4 immune-mediated AEs occurred in 4 patients (2.1%); and treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation of 3 patients (1.6%), 2 of whom had immune-mediated AEs that led to death (autoimmune hepatitis and pneumonitis). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Durvalumab, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, demonstrates favorable clinical activity and an encouraging and manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced/metastatic UC.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01693562.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.