Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28817732›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2017

Enhanced inflammation in New Zealand white rabbits when MERS-CoV reinfection occurs in the absence of neutralizing antibody.

Katherine V Houser, Andrew J Broadbent, Lisa Gretebeck, Leatrice Vogel, Elaine W Lamirande, Troy Sutton, Kevin W Bock, Mahnaz Minai, Marlene Orandle, Ian N Moore and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04372979 (Evaluation Of Efficacy Of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma In The Early Care Of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized Outside Intensive Care Units.), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04372979 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation Of Efficacy Of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma In The Early Care Of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized Outside Intensive Care Units.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDirection Centrale du Service de Santé des ArméesRan2020 to 2021Enrolled18ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsTransfusion of SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Plasma., Transfusion of standard Plasma.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 recurrence associated with the virus storage in the Spleen.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katherine V HouserLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Andrew J BroadbentLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4716-1835
Lisa GretebeckLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Leatrice VogelLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Elaine W LamirandeLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-7319
Troy SuttonLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Kevin W BockComparative Medicine Branch, Infectious Disease Pathogenesis Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-0937
Mahnaz MinaiComparative Medicine Branch, Infectious Disease Pathogenesis Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-8063
Marlene OrandleComparative Medicine Branch, Infectious Disease Pathogenesis Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Ian N MooreComparative Medicine Branch, Infectious Disease Pathogenesis Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Kanta SubbaraoLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1713-3056

Funding

Clinical Studies of Vaccines for Pandemic InfluenzaZIAAI000997 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI COHEN, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2021
$29.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a zoonotic betacoronavirus that was first detected in humans in 2012 as a cause of severe acute respiratory disease. As of July 28, 2017, there have been 2,040 confirmed cases with 712 reported deaths. While many infections have been fatal, there have also been a large number of mild or asymptomatic cases discovered through monitoring and contact tracing. New Zealand white rabbits are a possible model for asymptomatic infection with MERS-CoV. In order to discover more about non-lethal infections and to learn whether a single infection with MERS-CoV would protect against reinfection, we inoculated rabbits with MERS-CoV and monitored the antibody and inflammatory response. Following intranasal infection, rabbits developed a transient dose-dependent pulmonary infection with moderately high levels of viral RNA, viral antigen, and perivascular inflammation in multiple lung lobes that was not associated with clinical signs. The rabbits developed antibodies against viral proteins that lacked neutralizing activity and the animals were not protected from reinfection. In fact, reinfection resulted in enhanced pulmonary inflammation, without an associated increase in viral RNA titers. Interestingly, passive transfer of serum from previously infected rabbits to naïve rabbits was associated with enhanced inflammation upon infection. We further found this inflammation was accompanied by increased recruitment of complement proteins compared to primary infection. However, reinfection elicited neutralizing antibodies that protected rabbits from subsequent viral challenge. Our data from the rabbit model suggests that people exposed to MERS-CoV who fail to develop a neutralizing antibody response, or persons whose neutralizing antibody titers have waned, may be at risk for severe lung disease on re-exposure to MERS-CoV.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCoronavirus InfectionsDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFluorescent Antibody TechniqueImmunohistochemistryInflammationMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusNeutralization TestsPolymerase Chain ReactionRabbitsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID28817732
PMCPMC5574614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.