Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28817729›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Comparison of bioimpedance spectroscopy and X-Ray micro-computed tomography for total fat volume measurement in mice.

Gaelle Aubertin, Amira Sayeh, Jean-Philippe Dillenseger, Estelle Ayme-Dietrich, Philippe Choquet, Nathalie Niederhoffer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantification of body fluid compartmentalization by combined time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance and bioimpedance spectroscopy.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gaelle AubertinLaboratoire de Neurobiologie et Pharmacologie Cardiovasculaire (EA7296), Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-1279
Amira SayehPreclinical Imaging Lab, UF 6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, ICube, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Philippe DillensegerPreclinical Imaging Lab, UF 6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, ICube, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Estelle Ayme-DietrichLaboratoire de Neurobiologie et Pharmacologie Cardiovasculaire (EA7296), Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Philippe ChoquetPreclinical Imaging Lab, UF 6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, ICube, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Nathalie NiederhofferLaboratoire de Neurobiologie et Pharmacologie Cardiovasculaire (EA7296), Faculté de Médecine, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity and the metabolic syndrome are two pathologies whose prevalence are in a constant increase. Evaluation of the total fat mass but also of the distribution between visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue are important factors while assessing the pathophysiology of these two pathologies. Computed tomography (CT) and bioimpedance (BIS) are the translational methods the most frequently used in human beings as well as in rodent models in longitudinal studies on adiposity and obesity. Surprisingly, no direct comparison of micro-CT and BIS was reported yet in mice. Therefore, the present study was carried out to evaluate and compare the accuracy and the uncertainty of measurement of micro-CT and BIS in this species. The proportion of fat mass was measured with BIS, micro-CT and direct post-mortem tissue weight, and correlations between the data were established to evaluate the accuracy of the methods but also the uncertainty of BIS and micro-CT. There were significant correlations between weights of fat tissues on scale and proportion of total fat mass determined by BIS or micro-CT (r = 0.81 and 0.86 respectively) but both methods overestimated the total fat mass, especially in the smallest animals; overestimation of fat mass was amplified with BIS compared to micro-CT. In addition BIS and micro-CT were highly correlated (r = 0.94). Test-test reliability showed a greater variability of the BIS with respect to the micro-CT (coefficient of variation = 17.2 vs 5.6% respectively). Hence, as far as subtle differences between groups or changes within one group are awaited, micro-CT may appear as the most reliable method for determination of fat mass in mice. Micro-CT, unlike BIS, will also allow to qualitatively and quantitatively differentiate between subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues, which is of major importance in studies on adiposity and its complications.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAnimalsAutopsyBody CompositionMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReproducibility of ResultsSpectrum AnalysisX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID28817729
PMCPMC5560854
OpenAlexW2748509330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.