Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28817725›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Development of a psychological intervention for fatigue after stroke.

Simiao Wu, Trudie Chalder, Kirstin E Anderson, David Gillespie, Malcolm R Macleod, Gillian E Mead

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02131532 (A Feasibility Study of a Brief Psychological Intervention for Post-stroke Fatigue), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02131532 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Feasibility Study of a Brief Psychological Intervention for Post-stroke Fatigue

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2014 to 2015Enrolled12ConditionsStrokeArmsA brief psychological intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cervical Artery Dissection and Sports.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simiao WuDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Trudie ChalderDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kirstin E AndersonDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David GillespieDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Malcolm R MacleodCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Gillian E MeadCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimPost-stroke fatigue (PSF) is common and distressing, but there is insufficient evidence to recommend any effective treatment for it. Psychological interventions are effective in treating fatigue in other conditions. This paper describes the development and evaluation of the feasibility of a psychological intervention for PSF.

methodsBased on psychological correlates of PSF and evidence-based psychological interventions for fatigue in other medical conditions, we developed a manualised psychological intervention for PSF, with input from stroke clinicians, psychological therapists, and stroke survivors. The intervention was delivered by a clinical psychologist to 12 participants with PSF to test its acceptability and feasibility. According to the feedback from participants and therapists, the intervention was refined for future use.

resultsThe intervention consisted of six individual, face-to-face treatment sessions, and one follow-up, telephone-delivered booster session. It included psycho-education and discussion of strategies to promote physical and social activities and to challenge unhelpful thoughts. Four participants dropped out and the remaining eight participants completed the intervention. These eight participants also completed all assessments and feedback and reported fatigue levels as lower at the end of the study than at the baseline. All participants reported favourable opinions on the intervention and suggested that the last two treatment sessions be combined and the booster session be delivered in person as opposed to telephone.

conclusionsThis psychological intervention was acceptable to stroke patients and was feasible in the local health service. These findings suggest that a randomised controlled trial to test efficacy is warranted.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyFatigueFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleStroke

Identifiers

PMID28817725
PMCPMC5560529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.