Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28817653›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Perilymph pharmacokinetics of marker applied through a cochlear implant in guinea pigs.

Alec Salt, Jared Hartsock, Ruth Gill, Daniel Smyth, Jonathon Kirk, Kristien Verhoeven

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A review of peristaltic micropumps.Sensors and actuators. A, Physical · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Microtechnologies for inner ear drug delivery.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A nanoliter resolution implantable micropump for murine inner ear drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Long-TermFrontiers in neurology · 2019
    Article
  15. Gene Therapy for Human Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alec SaltDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis Missouri, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-9256
Jared HartsockDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis Missouri, United States of America.
Ruth GillDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis Missouri, United States of America.
Daniel SmythCochlear Technology Centre Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium.
Jonathon KirkCochlear Americas, Centennial, Colorado, United States of America.
Kristien VerhoevenCochlear Technology Centre Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium.
Washington University in St. Louis · USCochlear (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergoing cochlear implantation could benefit from a simultaneous application of drugs into the ear, helping preserve residual low-frequency hearing and afferent nerve fiber populations. One way to apply drugs is to incorporate a cannula into the implant, through which drug solution is driven. For such an approach, perilymph concentrations achieved and the distribution in the ear over time have not previously been documented. We used FITC-labeled dextran as a marker, delivering it into perilymph of guinea pigs at 10 or 100 nL/min though a cannula incorporated into a cochlear implant with the outlet in the mid basal turn. After injections of varying duration (2 hours, 1 day or 7 days) perilymph was collected from the cochlear apex using a sequential sampling technique, allowing dextran levels and gradients along scala tympani to be quantified. Data were interpreted quantitatively using computer simulations of the experiments. For injections of 2 hours duration, dextran levels were critically influenced by the presence or absence of fluid leakage at the cochleostomy site. When the cochleostomy was fluid-tight, substantially higher perilymph levels were achieved at the injection site, with concentration declining along scala tympani towards the apex. Contrary to expectations, large dextran gradients along scala tympani persisted after 24 hours of sustained injection and were still present in some animals after 7 days injection. Functional changes associated with implantation and dextran delivery, and the histological state of the implant and cannula were also documented. The persistent longitudinal gradients of dextan along the ear were not readily explained by computer simulations of the experiments based on prior pharmacokinetic data. One explanation is that inner ear pharmacokinetics are altered in the period after cochlear implantation, possibly by a permeabilization of the blood-labyrinth barrier as part of the immune response to the implant.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCochlear ImplantsPerilymphAnimalsGuinea PigsPharmacokineticsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28817653
PMCPMC5560723
OpenAlexW2746428632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.