ArticlePloS one2017
Perilymph pharmacokinetics of marker applied through a cochlear implant in guinea pigs.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local Delivery of Therapeutics to the Inner Ear: The State of the Science.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Pooled it
- Pirfenidone Reduces Intracochlear Fibrosis Caused by Cochlear Implantation in a Guinea Pig Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Long-term in vivo pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone-loaded cochlear implant electrode carrier dummies with optimized release profiles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Acute histological reactions in the otolith organs to inner ear drug delivery through a cochlear implant.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Deep intracochlear injection of triamcinolone-acetonide with an inner ear catheter in patients with residual hearing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Inner Ear Drug Delivery for Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Current Challenges and Opportunities.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- A review of peristaltic micropumps.Sensors and actuators. A, Physical · 2021Article
- A Wirelessly Controlled Scalable 3D-Printed Microsystem for Drug Delivery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Microtechnologies for inner ear drug delivery.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2020Review
- A 3D-Printed Modular Microreservoir for Drug Delivery.Micromachines · 2020Article
- A radiolabeled drug tracing method to study neurotrophin-3 retention and distribution in the cochlea after nano-based local delivery.MethodsX · 2020Article
- A nanoliter resolution implantable micropump for murine inner ear drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019Article
- Cochlear compound action potentials from high-level tone bursts originate from wide cochlear regions that are offset toward the most sensitive cochlear region.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Long-TermFrontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Gene Therapy for Human Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Review
- Animal model studies yield translational solutions for cochlear drug delivery.Hearing research · 2018Review
- Pharmacokinetic principles in the inner ear: Influence of drug properties on intratympanic applications.Hearing research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients undergoing cochlear implantation could benefit from a simultaneous application of drugs into the ear, helping preserve residual low-frequency hearing and afferent nerve fiber populations. One way to apply drugs is to incorporate a cannula into the implant, through which drug solution is driven. For such an approach, perilymph concentrations achieved and the distribution in the ear over time have not previously been documented. We used FITC-labeled dextran as a marker, delivering it into perilymph of guinea pigs at 10 or 100 nL/min though a cannula incorporated into a cochlear implant with the outlet in the mid basal turn. After injections of varying duration (2 hours, 1 day or 7 days) perilymph was collected from the cochlear apex using a sequential sampling technique, allowing dextran levels and gradients along scala tympani to be quantified. Data were interpreted quantitatively using computer simulations of the experiments. For injections of 2 hours duration, dextran levels were critically influenced by the presence or absence of fluid leakage at the cochleostomy site. When the cochleostomy was fluid-tight, substantially higher perilymph levels were achieved at the injection site, with concentration declining along scala tympani towards the apex. Contrary to expectations, large dextran gradients along scala tympani persisted after 24 hours of sustained injection and were still present in some animals after 7 days injection. Functional changes associated with implantation and dextran delivery, and the histological state of the implant and cannula were also documented. The persistent longitudinal gradients of dextan along the ear were not readily explained by computer simulations of the experiments based on prior pharmacokinetic data. One explanation is that inner ear pharmacokinetics are altered in the period after cochlear implantation, possibly by a permeabilization of the blood-labyrinth barrier as part of the immune response to the implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.