Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28817590›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Reconstructing Asian faunal introductions to eastern Africa from multi-proxy biomolecular and archaeological datasets.

Mary E Prendergast, Michael Buckley, Alison Crowther, Laurent Frantz, Heidi Eager, Ophélie Lebrasseur, Rainer Hutterer, Ardern Hulme-Beaman, Wim Van Neer, Katerina Douka and 19 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Origin of the domestic chicken from modern biological and zooarchaeological approaches.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Urban rats have less variable, higher protein diets.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Mary E PrendergastRadcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0275-6795
Michael BuckleyFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alison CrowtherSchool of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane Queensland, Australia.
Laurent FrantzPalaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Heidi EagerDept. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Ophélie LebrasseurPalaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rainer HuttererDept. Vertebrates, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany.
Ardern Hulme-BeamanDept. Archaeology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Wim Van NeerRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium.
Katerina DoukaResearch Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Margaret-Ashley VeallResearch Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eréndira M Quintana MoralesDept. Anthropology, Rice University, Houston, United States of America.
Verena J SchuenemannInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ella ReiterInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Richard AllenPalaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Evangelos A DimopoulosPalaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard M HelmCanterbury Archaeological Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Ceri ShiptonMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ogeto MwebiDept. Zoology, Osteology Section, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christiane DenysDept. Systématique & Evolution, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Mark HortonDept. Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Stephanie Wynne-JonesDept. Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey FleisherDept. Anthropology, Rice University, Houston, United States of America.
Chantal RadimilahyMusée d'Art et d'Archéologie, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Henry WrightMuseum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of America.
Jeremy B SearleDept. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Johannes KrauseInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Greger LarsonPalaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nicole L BoivinMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council 337574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-mediated biological exchange has had global social and ecological impacts. In sub-Saharan Africa, several domestic and commensal animals were introduced from Asia in the pre-modern period; however, the timing and nature of these introductions remain contentious. One model supports introduction to the eastern African coast after the mid-first millennium CE, while another posits introduction dating back to 3000 BCE. These distinct scenarios have implications for understanding the emergence of long-distance maritime connectivity, and the ecological and economic impacts of introduced species. Resolution of this longstanding debate requires new efforts, given the lack of well-dated fauna from high-precision excavations, and ambiguous osteomorphological identifications. We analysed faunal remains from 22 eastern African sites spanning a wide geographic and chronological range, and applied biomolecular techniques to confirm identifications of two Asian taxa: domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and black rat (Rattus rattus). Our approach included ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis aided by BLAST-based bioinformatics, Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) collagen fingerprinting, and direct AMS (accelerator mass spectrometry) radiocarbon dating. Our results support a late, mid-first millennium CE introduction of these species. We discuss the implications of our findings for models of biological exchange, and emphasize the applicability of our approach to tropical areas with poor bone preservation.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAnimals, DomesticArchaeologyAsiaChickensCollagenDNA FingerprintingHistory, AncientIntroduced SpeciesRadiometric DatingRatsCollagen

Identifiers

PMID28817590
PMCPMC5560628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.