ArticleCritical care medicine2017
Revised National Estimates of Emergency Department Visits for Sepsis in the United States.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sepsis Alert Systems, Mortality, and Adherence in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a prognostic factor for infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Validation of the updated sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)-2 score in emergency department septic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Sepsis and Septic Shock Among Patients with Documented Fever at Emergency Department Triage Using Patients' Historical Data.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Impact of a Cellular Host-Response Sepsis Diagnostic on Clinical Decision Making in the Emergency Department: A Vignette-Based Study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for sepsis management in the emergency department.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Physician Variation in Early Sepsis Management.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing non-traumatic acute care: a review of the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in triaging and diagnosis.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- A Heart Rate Variability-Derived Decision Support Tool for Prognostication in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Infection.BioMed research international · 2026Observational
- The weekend effect in sepsis and septic shock: a 5-year US national study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Prediction of infection in the emergency department-a machine learning model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Racial Disparities in Septic Shock Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis (2016-2020).Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Antibiotic Regimens in Reducing White Blood Cell Count Within Three to Five Days in Febrile Leukocytosis Treated With Ambulatory Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2025Article
- Dynamic nomogram predicts sepsis risk in patients with acute liver failure: Analysis of intensive care database with external validation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The Effect of Sepsis Recognition on Telemedicine Use in Rural Emergency Department Sepsis Treatment.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2025Article
- Evaluating Sepsis Management and Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of Clinical and Treatment Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Integrated multiomics and Mendelian randomization identify CHIT1 as a novel sepsis biomarker and therapeutic target.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- An Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study of Intensive Care Unit Net Benefit: Triage and Trajectory for Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Failure.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe emergency department is an important venue for initial sepsis recognition and care. We sought to determine contemporary estimates of the epidemiology of U.S. emergency department visits for sepsis.
designAnalysis of data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
settingU.S. emergency department visits, 2009-2011. PATIENTS: Adult (age, ≥ 18 yr) emergency department sepsis patients. We defined serious infection as an emergency department diagnosis of a serious infection or a triage temperature greater than 38°C or less than 36°C. We defined three emergency department sepsis classifications: 1) original emergency department sepsis-serious infection plus emergency department diagnosis of organ dysfunction, endotracheal intubation, or systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg or explicit sepsis emergency department diagnoses; 2) quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment emergency department sepsis-serious infection plus presence of at least two "quick" Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 14, respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths/min, or systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mm Hg); and 3) revised emergency department sepsis-original or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment emergency department sepsis.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe used survey design and weighting variables to produce national estimates of annual adult emergency department visits using updated sepsis classifications. Over 2009-2011, there were 103,257,516 annual adult emergency department visits. The estimated number of emergency department sepsis visits were as follows: 1) original emergency department sepsis 665,319 (0.64%; 95% CI, 0.57-0.73); 2) quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment emergency department sepsis 318,832 (0.31%; 95% CI, 0.26-0.37); and 3) revised emergency department sepsis 847,868 (0.82%; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91).
conclusionsSepsis continues to present a major burden to U.S. emergency departments, affecting up to nearly 850,000 emergency department visits annually. Updated sepsis classifications may impact national estimates of emergency department sepsis epidemiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.