Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28816978›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dongyong Zhu, Lisha Wang, Hanfei Zhang, Jie Chen, Yanfang Wang, Sama Byanju, Meiyan Liao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic prediction byFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Value of Baseline [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Predictive value ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongyong ZhuDepartment of Radiology Department of Neurology, ZhongNan Hospital of WuHan University, Wuhan City, People's Republic of China.
Lisha Wang
Hanfei Zhang
Jie Chen
Yanfang Wang
Sama Byanju
Meiyan Liao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of pancreatic carcinoma (PC) patients with poor prognosis is a priority in clinical oncology because of their high 5-year mortality. However, the prognostic value of pretreatment F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG)- positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) parameters in PC patients is controversial and no consensus exists as to its predictive capability. This meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively explore the prognostic significance of F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

methodsExtensive literature searches of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify literature published until March 5, 2017. Comparative analyses of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed to assess their correlations with pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Either the fixed- or the random-effects model was adopted, depending on the heterogeneity observed across studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results.

resultsSixteen studies including 1146 patients were identified. The pooled HRs for the probability of EFS were 1.90 (95% confidential interval (CI): 1.48-2.45) for SUVmax, 1.76 (95% CI: 1.20-2.58) for MTV, and 1.81 (95% CI: 1.27-2.58) for TLG. The pooled HRs for the probability of OS were 1.21 (95% CI: 1.12-1.31) for SUVmax, 1.56 (95% CI: 1.13-2.16) for MTV, and 1.70 (95% CI: 1.25-2.30) for TLG. A slight publication bias was detected using Begg test. After adjustment using the trim and fill procedure, the corrected HRs were not significantly different. The results of the subgroup analyses by SUVmax, MTV, and TLG showed that these factors may have similar prognostic significance.

conclusionF-FDG-PET/CT parameters, such as SUVmax, MTV, and TLG, may be significant prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. F-FDG-PET/CT imaging could be a promising tool to provide prognostic information for these patients.

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID28816978
PMCPMC5571715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.