SynthesisMedicine2017
Efficacy and safety evaluation of fludarabine-based chemotherapy regimen for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fludarabine (F)-based regimen for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) compared with other regimens with no F contained.PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and CNKI databases were searched to identify eligible literatures. R software version 3.12 was used for statistical analysis. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized to express the complete response, overall response and adverse events outcomes. Egger test was carried out to examine the publication bias and sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of our results.Twelve eligible literatures consisting of 1587 patients were included in this study. Greater complete response (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.98-2.80) and overall response (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.85-2.24) were found for patients who received F-based regimen than those received other regimens, although the results were not statistically significant. In addition, F-based regimen was associated with significantly lower risk of adverse events compared with other regimens (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28-0.74). Results of subgroup analysis showed that significantly lower incidence was presented only for constipation among the 7 specific adverse events (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.14).F-based chemotherapy regimen was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with NHL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.