Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28816621›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2017

Use/disuse paradigms are ubiquitous concepts in characterizing the process of inheritance.

Sophie Juliane Veigl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: a historian's perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sophie Juliane Veigla Department of History , University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, a Lamarckian theme has found its way back into academic discourse on evolution and inheritance. Especially the emerging field of transgenerational small RNAs has provided at least a proof of concept for the inheritance of acquired traits. Yet it remains unclear whether the Lamarckian concept of inheritance will in fact have its rennaisance or whether it will remain the rallying cry for the outlaws, heretics and enfants terribles of molecular biology. As unclear as the future of Lamarckian theory is its content and reference. Since the formulation of the Philosophie Zoologique, Lamarckian thought has been de- and reconfiguring in and out of the scientific literature and become an umbrella-term for all kinds of unconventional modes of inheritance. This essay will argue that heritable small RNAs might in fact provide a case of genuine Lamarckian inheritance. Moreover, it will be claimed that not only the very broad concept of "inheritance of acquired traits" applies, but also that Lamarck's mechanistic insight into a use/disuse relation might help to explain a specific mode of transgenerational inheritance.

Indexed as

Inheritance PatternsAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansRNA, Small UntranslatedRNA, Small Untranslatedepigenetic inheritanceinheritance of acquired traitsLamarckian inheritancequantitative explanationsRNAi inheritancesmall RNAs

Identifiers

PMID28816621
PMCPMC5731813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.