Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28816242›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Effect of the mGluR5-NAM Basimglurant on Behavior in Adolescents and Adults with Fragile X Syndrome in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial: FragXis Phase 2 Results.

Eriene A Youssef, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, Christian Czech, Randi J Hagerman, David Hessl, Chin Y Wong, Michael Rabbia, Dennis Deptula, Amy John, Russell Kinch and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of AFQ056 on language learning in fragile X syndrome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry, and Kinetic Modeling of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mouse models of fragile X-related disorders.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Eriene A YoussefRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center New York, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth Berry-KravisDepartments of Pediatrics, Neurological Sciences, and Biochemistry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christian CzechRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Randi J HagermanMedical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MIND) Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
David HesslMedical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MIND) Institute and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Chin Y WongGenentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael RabbiaRoche Product Development, Roche Innovation Center New York, New York, NY, USA.
Dennis DeptulaImmunoBrain Check Ltd., Ness-Ziona, Israel.
Amy JohnGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Russell KinchEisai EMEA, Hatfield, UK.
Philip DrewittRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Welwyn, Welwyn, UK.
Lothar LindemannRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Moritz MarcinowskiRoche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
Rachel LanglandGenomics & Oncology Research, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA.
Carsten HornRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Paulo FontouraRoche Neuroscience Product Development, Basel, Switzerland.
Luca SantarelliTherachon, AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Jorge A QuirozSolid Biosciences, Cambridge, MA, USA.
FragXis Study Group
Roche (Switzerland) · CHGilead Sciences (United States) · USRoche (United States) · USSolidus Biosciences (United States) · USUniversity of California, Davis · USLa Roche College · USRoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DERoche (United Kingdom) · GBRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical data suggest that inhibition of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) receptor might hold therapeutic benefits in Fragile X syndrome (FXS). Treatment of Fmr1 knockout mice with mGluR5-negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) has been reported to correct a broad range of phenotypes related to FXS. The early short-term clinical trials with mGluR5 NAMs, including basimglurant, assessing the effects in individuals with FXS, were supportive of further exploration in larger, well-controlled trials. We evaluated basimglurant, a potent and selective mGluR5 NAM, in a 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study of 183 adults and adolescents (aged 14-50, mean 23.4 years) with FXS. Individuals with an FMR1 full mutation were randomized to placebo or one of two doses of basimglurant. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in behavioral symptoms using the Anxiety Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS) total score. All treatment arms showed marked behavioral improvements from baseline to week 12 with less improvement in the basimglurant 1.5 mg arm than placebo; however, basimglurant 0.5 mg was inferior to placebo in the ADAMs total score. Treatment with basimglurant was overall well-tolerated. A higher incidence of adverse events classified as psychiatric disorders were reported in patients treated with basimglurant, including three patients with hallucinations or psychosis. In this phase 2 clinical trial, basimglurant did not demonstrate improvement over placebo. Evaluation of the overall risk-benefit in younger patient populations is an important consideration for the design of potential further investigations of efficacy with this class of medications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDNA MethylationDouble-Blind MethodExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeHumansImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedPsychotropic DrugsPyridinesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5RNA, Messenger2-chloro-4-(1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2,5-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-4-ylethynyl)pyridineExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1GRM5 protein, humanImidazolesPsychotropic DrugsPyridinesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5RNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID28816242
PMCPMC5770759
OpenAlexW2750406832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.