Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28816177›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2017

Electrical stimulation of gut motility guided by an in silico model.

Bradley B Barth, Craig S Henriquez, Warren M Grill, Xiling Shen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Control of colonic motility using electrical stimulation to modulate enteric neural activity.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Electroceuticals in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley B BarthDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4344-7182
Craig S HenriquezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5395-3767
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-6588
Xiling ShenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-3531
Duke University · US

Funding

Robust Control of the Stem Cell NicheR35GM122465 · NIGMS · TERASAKI INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION · PI Xiling Shen · 2017 to 2026
$5.6M
Multi-scale modeling of asymmetric cell divisionR01GM095990 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SHEN, XILING · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Robustness of the Intestinal Stem Cell NicheR01GM114254 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHEN, XILING · 2015 to 2017
$918k
Functional mapping of efferent gut neuroepithelial circuitsOT2OD023849 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHEN, XILING · 2016 to 2016
$493k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095990NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114254NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122465NIH HHS OT2 OD023849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeuromodulation of the central and peripheral nervous systems is becoming increasingly important for treating a diverse set of diseases-ranging from Parkinson's Disease and epilepsy to chronic pain. However, neuromodulation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract has achieved relatively limited success in treating functional GI disorders, which affect a significant population, because the effects of stimulation on the enteric nervous system (ENS) and gut motility are not well understood. Here we develop an integrated neuromechanical model of the ENS and assess neurostimulation strategies for enhancing gut motility, validated by in vivo experiments. APPROACH: The computational model included a network of enteric neurons, smooth muscle fibers, and interstitial cells of Cajal, which regulated propulsion of a virtual pellet in a model of gut motility. MAIN

resultsSimulated extracellular stimulation of ENS-mediated motility revealed that sinusoidal current at 0.5 Hz was more effective at increasing intrinsic peristalsis and reducing colon transit time than conventional higher frequency rectangular current pulses, as commonly used for neuromodulation therapy. Further analysis of the model revealed that the 0.5 Hz sinusoidal currents were more effective at modulating the pacemaker frequency of interstitial cells of Cajal. To test the predictions of the model, we conducted in vivo electrical stimulation of the distal colon while measuring bead propulsion in awake rats. Experimental results confirmed that 0.5 Hz sinusoidal currents were more effective than higher frequency pulses at enhancing gut motility. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates an in silico GI neuromuscular model to enable GI neuromodulation parameter optimization and suggests that low frequency sinusoidal currents may improve the efficacy of GI pacing.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAnimalsElectric StimulationEnteric Nervous SystemFemaleGastrointestinal MotilityGastrointestinal TractMyocytes, Smooth MuscleRatsRats, Inbred F344Telocytes

Identifiers

PMID28816177
PMCPMC5724779
OpenAlexW2749848679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.