ArticleJournal of neural engineering2017
Electrical stimulation of gut motility guided by an in silico model.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Biophysical Model of Human Colonic Motor Pattern Generation in Health and Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Modeling based insights into mechanical dysfunction in esophageal motility disorders.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Burst-patterned stimulation restores colonic motility in preclinical models.Science translational medicine · 2025Article
- Neural regulation of slow waves and phasic contractions in the distal stomach: a mathematical model.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Computational models of autonomic regulation in gastric motility: Progress, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- A forecasting method of postoperative intestinal paralysis and its timely resolution.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2023Article
- Engaging biological oscillators through second messenger pathways permits emergence of a robust gastric slow-wave during peristalsis.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Mapping the peripheral nervous system in the whole mouse via compressed sensing tractography.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Control of colonic motility using electrical stimulation to modulate enteric neural activity.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2021Article
- Strategies to Refine Gastric Stimulation and Pacing Protocols: Experimental and Modeling Approaches.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Electroceuticals in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020Review
- Opportunities and Challenges for Single-Unit Recordings from Enteric Neurons in Awake Animals.Micromachines · 2018Review
- Computational motility models of neurogastroenterology and neuromodulation.Brain research · 2018Review
- Credibility, Replicability, and Reproducibility in Simulation for Biomedicine and Clinical Applications in Neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNeuromodulation of the central and peripheral nervous systems is becoming increasingly important for treating a diverse set of diseases-ranging from Parkinson's Disease and epilepsy to chronic pain. However, neuromodulation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract has achieved relatively limited success in treating functional GI disorders, which affect a significant population, because the effects of stimulation on the enteric nervous system (ENS) and gut motility are not well understood. Here we develop an integrated neuromechanical model of the ENS and assess neurostimulation strategies for enhancing gut motility, validated by in vivo experiments. APPROACH: The computational model included a network of enteric neurons, smooth muscle fibers, and interstitial cells of Cajal, which regulated propulsion of a virtual pellet in a model of gut motility. MAIN
resultsSimulated extracellular stimulation of ENS-mediated motility revealed that sinusoidal current at 0.5 Hz was more effective at increasing intrinsic peristalsis and reducing colon transit time than conventional higher frequency rectangular current pulses, as commonly used for neuromodulation therapy. Further analysis of the model revealed that the 0.5 Hz sinusoidal currents were more effective at modulating the pacemaker frequency of interstitial cells of Cajal. To test the predictions of the model, we conducted in vivo electrical stimulation of the distal colon while measuring bead propulsion in awake rats. Experimental results confirmed that 0.5 Hz sinusoidal currents were more effective than higher frequency pulses at enhancing gut motility. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates an in silico GI neuromuscular model to enable GI neuromodulation parameter optimization and suggests that low frequency sinusoidal currents may improve the efficacy of GI pacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.