Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28816053›Full record

ArticleAlternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA2017

In vitro exposure systems and dosimetry assessment tools for inhaled tobacco products: Workshop proceedings, conclusions and paths forward for in vitro model use.

Holger Behrsing, Erin Hill, Hans Raabe, Raymond Tice, Suzanne Fitzpatrick, Robert Devlin, Kent Pinkerton, Günter Oberdörster, Chris Wright, Roman Wieczorek and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. In Vitro Consequences of Electronic-Cigarette Flavoring Exposure on the Immature Lung.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Pathway-based predictive approaches for non-animal assessment of acute inhalation toxicity.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 5 countries.

Holger BehrsingInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Erin HillInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Hans RaabeInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Raymond TiceRTIce Consulting, Hillsborough, NC, USA.
Suzanne FitzpatrickUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Robert DevlinUS Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Kent PinkertonCenter for Health and the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Günter OberdörsterUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Chris WrightBritish American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd, Southampton, UK.
Roman WieczorekImperial Tobacco Limited, Hamburg, Germany.
Michaela AufderheideCultex® Laboratories GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Sandro SteinerPhilip Morris Product SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Tobias KrebsVitrocell® Systems GmbH, Waldkirch, Germany.
Bahman AsgharianApplied Research Associates, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Richard CorleyPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Michael OldhamAltria Client Services, LLC, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jason AdamsonBritish American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd, Southampton.
Xiang LiZhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute of CNTC, Zhengzhou City, China.
Irfan RahmanUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sonia GregoRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Pei-Hsuan ChuNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MA, USA.
Shaun McCulloughUS Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Rodger CurrenInstitute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Institute for In Vitro Sciences · USBritish American Tobacco (United Kingdom) · GBEnvironmental Protection Agency · USAltria (United States) · USApplied Research Associates (United States) · USIDEXX Laboratories (Germany) · DENational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USPhilip Morris International (Switzerland) · CHRTI International · USTobacco Research Institute · CNUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2009, the passing of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act facilitated the establishment of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), and gave it regulatory authority over the marketing, manufacture and distribution of tobacco products, including those termed 'modified risk'. On 4-6 April 2016, the Institute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc. (IIVS) convened a workshop conference entitled, In Vitro Exposure Systems and Dosimetry Assessment Tools for Inhaled Tobacco Products, to bring together stakeholders representing regulatory agencies, academia and industry to address the research priorities articulated by the FDA CTP. Specific topics were covered to assess the status of current in vitro smoke and aerosol/vapour exposure systems, as well as the various approaches and challenges to quantifying the complex exposures in in vitro pulmonary models developed for evaluating adverse pulmonary events resulting from tobacco product exposures. The four core topics covered were: a) Tobacco Smoke and E-Cigarette Aerosols; b) Air-Liquid Interface-In Vitro Exposure Systems; c) Dosimetry Approaches for Particles and Vapours/In Vitro Dosimetry Determinations; and d) Exposure Microenvironment/Physiology of Cells. The 2.5-day workshop included presentations from 20 expert speakers, poster sessions, networking discussions, and breakout sessions which identified key findings and provided recommendations to advance these technologies. Here, we will report on the proceedings, recommendations, and outcome of the April 2016 technical workshop, including paths forward for developing and validating non-animal test methods for tobacco product smoke and next generation tobacco product aerosol/vapour exposures. With the recent FDA publication of the final deeming rule for the governance of tobacco products, there is an unprecedented necessity to evaluate a very large number of tobacco-based products and ingredients. The questionable relevance, high cost, and ethical considerations for the use of in vivo testing methods highlight the necessity of robust in vitro approaches to elucidate tobacco-based exposures and how they may lead to pulmonary diseases that contribute to lung exposure-induced mortality worldwide.

Indexed as

AerosolsAnimalsElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesSmokingSpecies SpecificityTobacco ProductsToxicity TestsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAerosols

Identifiers

PMID28816053
PMCPMC9878375
OpenAlexW2764105939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.