Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815841›Full record

ReviewHead & neck2017

Response assessment after induction chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: From physical examination to modern imaging techniques and beyond.

Remco de Bree, Gregory T Wolf, Bart de Keizer, Iain J Nixon, Dana M Hartl, Arlene A Forastiere, Missak Haigentz, Alessandra Rinaldo, Juan P Rodrigo, Nabil F Saba and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Head & neck, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeting cuproptosis in liver cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The Neck-Persistency-Net: a three-dimensional, convolution, deep neural network aids in distinguishing vital from non-vital persistent cervical lymph nodes in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after primary concurrent radiochemotherapy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Use ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-5814
Gregory T WolfDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bart de KeizerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Iain J NixonEar, Nose, and Throat Department, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-8783
Dana M HartlDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Cedex, France.
Arlene A ForastiereDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Missak HaigentzDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Alessandra RinaldoUniversity of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy.
Juan P RodrigoInstituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Nabil F SabaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-1477
Carlos SuárezDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Jan B VermorkenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Alfio FerlitoCoordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant correlations between the response to induction chemotherapy and success of subsequent radiotherapy have been reported and suggest that the response to induction chemotherapy is able to predict a response to radiotherapy. Therefore, induction chemotherapy may be used to tailor the treatment plan to the individual patient with head and neck cancer: following the planned subsequent (chemo)radiation schedule, planning a radiation dose boost, or reassessing the modality of treatment (eg, upfront surgery). Findings from reported trials suggest room for improvement in clinical response assessment after induction chemotherapy, but an optimal method has yet to be identified. Historically, indices of treatment efficacy in solid tumors have been based solely on systematic assessment of tumor size. However, functional imaging (eg, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) potentially provides an earlier indication of response to treatment than conventional imaging techniques. More advanced imaging techniques are still in an exploratory phase and are not ready for use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Induction ChemotherapyCarcinoma, Squamous CellDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansPositron-Emission TomographySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)head and neck squamous cell carcinomainduction chemotherapyresponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID28815841
PMCPMC5656833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.