Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815789›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

Cost-effectiveness of emergency department-initiated treatment for opioid dependence.

Susan H Busch, David A Fiellin, Marek C Chawarski, Patricia H Owens, Michael V Pantalon, Kathryn Hawk, Steven L Bernstein, Patrick G O'Connor, Gail D'Onofrio

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00913770 (Models of Screening, Brief Intervention With a Facilitated Referral to Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00913770 nacompletednot on this map

Models of Screening, Brief Intervention With a Facilitated Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Opioid Patients in the Emergency Department

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2008 to 2014Enrolled329ConditionsOpiate AddictionArmsBrief Negotiation Interview (BNI), Buprenorphine Initiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Economic Evaluations of Pharmacologic Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Routes of non-traditional entry into buprenorphine treatment programs.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. The Financial Sustainability of Programs to Initiate Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Emergency Department Settings.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Informing evidence-based medicine for opioid use disorder using pharmacoeconomic studies.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Economic Evaluation Design within the HEAL Prevention Cooperative.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  20. The Cost of Universal Suicide Risk Screening for Adolescents in Emergency Departments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan H BuschDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
David A FiellinDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Marek C ChawarskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Patricia H OwensDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael V PantalonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kathryn HawkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Steven L BernsteinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Patrick G O'ConnorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Gail D'OnofrioDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USYale New Haven Health System · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Drug use, Addiction and HIV Research Scholars (DAHRS)K12DA033312 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Gail D'Onofrio, Patrick O'Connor · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
Models of SBIRT for Opioid Dependent Patients in the Emergency DepartmentR01DA025991 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI D'ONOFRIO, GAIL, FIELLIN, DAVID · 2008 to 2012
$4.8M
Expanding Treatment of Opioid Dependence Among the Privately InsuredR01DA026414 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BUSCH, SUSAN H · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA033312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025991NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIn a recent randomized trial, patients with opioid dependence receiving brief intervention, emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine and ongoing follow-up in primary care with buprenorphine (buprenorphine) were twice as likely to be engaged in addiction treatment compared with referral to community-based treatment (referral) or brief intervention and referral (brief intervention). Our aim was to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of these three methods of intervening on opioid dependence in the ED.

designMeasured health-care use was converted to dollar values. We considered a health-care system perspective and constructed cost-effectiveness acceptability curves that indicate the probability each treatment is cost-effective under different thresholds of willingness-to-pay for outcomes studied.

settingAn urban ED in the United States.

participantsOpioid-dependent patients aged 18 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported 30-day assessment data were used to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for patient engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days and the number of days illicit opioid-free in the past week.

findingsConsidering only health-care system costs, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicate that at all positive willingness-to-pay values, ED-initiated buprenorphine treatment was more cost-effective than brief intervention or referral. For example, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $1000 for 30-day treatment engagement, we are 79% certain ED-initiated buprenorphine is most cost-effective compared with other studied treatments. Similar results were found for days illicit opioid-free in the past week. Results were robust to secondary analyses that included patients with missing cost data, included crime and patient time costs in the numerator, and to changes in unit price estimates.

conclusionIn the United States, emergency department-initiated buprenorphine intervention for patients with opioid dependence provides high value compared with referral to community-based treatment or combined brief intervention and referral.

Indexed as

AftercareEmergency Service, HospitalPrimary Health CareAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth ServicesHumansOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPatient ParticipationReferral and ConsultationUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphinecost analysisemergency departmenthealth services researchopiatesscreening

Identifiers

PMID28815789
PMCPMC5657503
OpenAlexW2746744089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.