Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815771›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2018

Molstack-Interactive visualization tool for presentation, interpretation, and validation of macromolecules and electron density maps.

Przemyslaw J Porebski, Piotr Sroka, Heping Zheng, David R Cooper, Wladek Minor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gcn5-RelatedFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Przemyslaw J PorebskiDepartment of Biological Physics & Molecular Physiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Piotr SrokaDepartment of Biological Physics & Molecular Physiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Heping ZhengDepartment of Biological Physics & Molecular Physiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
David R CooperDepartment of Biological Physics & Molecular Physiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Wladek MinorDepartment of Biological Physics & Molecular Physiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Funding

Integrated resource for reproducibility in macromolecular crystallographyU01HG008424 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MINOR, WLADEK · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
X-ray data analysis in the presence of structural variability - Administrative SupplementR01GM117080 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MINOR, WLADEK, OTWINOWSKI, ZBYSZEK · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
Metal binding sites in macromolecular structuresR01GM117325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MINOR, WLADEK · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008424NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200026CNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117080NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the world of biomolecular structures is based upon the interpretation of macromolecular models, of which ∼90% are an interpretation of electron density maps. This structural information guides scientific progress and exploration in many biomedical disciplines. The Protein Data Bank's web portals have made these structures available for mass scientific consumption and greatly broaden the scope of information presented in scientific publications. The portals provide numerous quality metrics; however, the portion of the structure that is most vital for interpretation of the function may have the most difficult to interpret electron density and this ambiguity is not reflected by any single metric. The possible consequences of basing research on suboptimal models make it imperative to inspect the agreement of a model with its experimental evidence. Molstack, a web-based interactive publishing platform for structural data, allows users to present density maps and structural models by displaying a collection of maps and models, including different interpretation of one's own data, re-refinements, and corrections of existing structures. Molstack organizes the sharing and dissemination of these structural models along with their experimental evidence as an interactive session. Molstack was designed with three groups of users in mind; researchers can present the evidence of their interpretation, reviewers and readers can independently judge the experimental evidence of the authors' conclusions, and other researchers can present or even publish their new hypotheses in the context of prior results. The server is available at http://molstack.bioreproducibility.org.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinInternetModels, MolecularUser-Computer InterfaceProteinsProteinselectron density interpretationmacromolecular crystallographyreproducibilitystructural biologyweb server

Identifiers

PMID28815771
PMCPMC5734276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.