Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815502›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2017

FLPing Genes On and Off in Drosophila.

Bonnie M Weasner, Jinjin Zhu, Justin P Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. UsingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bonnie M WeasnerDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 915 E. Third Street, MY202A, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Jinjin ZhuDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 915 E. Third Street, MY202A, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Justin P KumarDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 915 E. Third Street, MY202A, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. jkumar@indiana.edu.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Repression of Non-Ocular Fates by the SIX and EYA Genes During Specification and Patterning of the RetinaR01EY014863 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 2003 to 2017
$4.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been a favorite experimental system of developmental biologists for more than a century. One of the most attractive features of this model system is the clarity by which one can analyze mutant phenotypes. Most genes are found in single copies, and loss-of-function mutants often have obvious phenotypes that can be analyzed during development and in adulthood. As with all metazoans, a significant fraction of Drosophila genes are used during both embryonic and postembryonic development, and null mutants often die during embryogenesis thereby precluding the analysis of postembryonic tissues. For several decades researchers worked around this problem by either studying gynandromorphs or irradiating chromosomes carrying mutations in the hope of inducing mitotic recombination which would then allow for the analysis of mutant phenotypes in smaller populations of cells. The former method suffers from the fact that mutations in the gene of interest are often lethal when generated in large sectors, which is a hallmark of gynandromorphs. Clonal induction with the latter method occurs at relatively low frequencies making this method laborious. The introduction of the yeast FRT System/FRT site-directed recombination system to Drosophila has made generating loss-of-function mosaic clones simple and easy. Over the years several variants of this method have allowed developmental biologists to remove genes, overexpress genes, and even express one gene in patches of cells that are mutant for a second gene. In this review we will briefly discuss some of various FRT System/FRT-based approaches that are being used to manipulate gene expression in Drosophila. The individual FRT System/FRT-based methods are described in the papers that are cited herein. We will outline the procedure that our lab uses to prepare and analyze mosaic clones in Drosophila eye-antennal imaginal discs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalRecombination, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedChromosomes, InsectClone CellsDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsImaginal DiscsLarvaMosaicismMutationDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDrosophila ProteinsFLP recombinaseGreen Fluorescent ProteinsSite-specific recombinaseDrosophilaFLP/FRTGene expressionImaginal discsMosaic clonesSite-specific recombinase

Identifiers

PMID28815502
PMCPMC5858584
OpenAlexW2748578173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.