Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815441›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2017

Pluripotent Stem Cells in Adult Tissues: Struggling To Be Acknowledged Over Two Decades.

Deepa Bhartiya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deepa BhartiyaStem Cell Biology Department, Indian Council of Medical Research - National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Jehangir Merwanji Street, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India. bhartiyad@nirrh.res.in.
National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells have fascinated scientists for a long time and huge research efforts have been put into them as they have the potential to regenerate diseased organs. Besides embryonic stem cells (ES) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), it has been postulated that pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) may also exist in various adult tissues. They are thought to be more primitive than the adult stem cells (ASCs), serve as a backup pool to give rise to ASCs and thus play a crucial role in maintaining life-long homeostasis. These PSCs could also be the embryonic stem cells in adult tissues that were proposed to initiate cancers according to the Embryonic Rest Hypothesis put forth in the nineteenth century. However, the very presence of PSCs in adult tissues is mired with controversies. This article is a sincere attempt to review research carried out by various investigators over the last two decades and various attempts to demonstrate their presence in adult tissues. Such adult PSCs could be the ideal stem cell candidates to bring about endogenous regeneration compared to ES/iPS cells grown in Petri dish and also score better over ASCs which in fact are tissue committed progenitors with limited regenerative potential that differentiate from the PSCs. PSCs in adult tissues have remained elusive until now as they possibly get unknowingly discarded due to their small size and inability to pellet at 1000-1200 rpm (250 g). They will likely prove to be a game changer in the field of stem cells biology, for regenerative medicine and for our understanding of cancer initiation.

Indexed as

AdultAdult Stem CellsCell DifferentiationEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsRegenerationRegenerative MedicineES cellsiPS cellsMAPCsMUSE cellsPluripotent stem cellsSpore-like cellsSTAP cellsVSELs

Identifiers

PMID28815441
OpenAlexW2747830800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.