Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815334›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Clinical characteristics of patient selection and imaging predictors of outcome in solid tumors treated with checkpoint-inhibitors.

Sabrina Rossi, Luca Toschi, Angelo Castello, Fabio Grizzi, Luigi Mansi, Egesta Lopci

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03563482 (Correlazione Dell'Imaging Metabolico Con l'Espressione Dei Marcatori Immunitari Nei Pazienti Con NSCLC Candidati All'Immunoterapia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03563482 naunknown statusnot on this map

Correlazione Dell'Imaging Metabolico Con l'Espressione Dei Marcatori Immunitari Nei Pazienti Con NSCLC Candidati All'Immunoterapia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Clinico HumanitasRan2017 to 2022Enrolled500ConditionsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Positron-Emission Tomography, ImmunotherapyArmsPET scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Compatibility of different PET/CT criteria in evaluating treatment response and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Imaging Immunotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Predictive value of [European radiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Metabolic activity viaBMC cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Potential of NovelFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Clinical challenges in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina RossiMedical Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Luca ToschiMedical Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Angelo CastelloNuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Fabio GrizziImmunology and Inflammation, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Luigi MansiNuclear Medicine, Seconda Università di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Egesta LopciNuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy. egesta.lopci@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-1094
Humanitas University · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro 18923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly evolving knowledge on tumor immunology and the continuous implementation of immunotherapy in cancer have recently led to the FDA and EMA approval of several checkpoint inhibitors as immunotherapic agents in clinical practice. Anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PDL-1 antibodies are becoming standard of care in advanced melanoma, as well as in relapsed or metastatic lung and kidney cancer, demonstrating higher and longer response compared to standard chemotherapy. These encouraging results have fostered the evaluation of these antibodies either alone or in combination with other therapies in several dozen clinical trials for the treatment of multiple tumor types. However, not all patients respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors, hence, specific biomarkers are necessary to guide and monitor therapy. The utility of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker has varied in different clinical trials, but, to date, no consensus has been reached on whether PD-L1 expression is an ideal marker for response and patient selection; approximately 20-25% of patients will respond to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors despite a negative PD-L1 staining. On the other hand, major issues concern the evaluation of objective response in patients treated with immunotherapy. Pure morphological criteria as commonly used in solid tumors (i.e. RECIST) are not sufficient because change in size is not an early and reliable marker of tumor response to biological therapies. Thus, the scientific community has required a continuous adaptation of immune-related response criteria (irRC) to overcome the problem. In this context, metabolic information and antibody-based imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) have been investigated, providing a powerful approach for an optimal stratification of patients at staging and during the evaluation of the response to therapy. In the present review we provide an overview on the clinical characteristics of patient selection when using imaging predictors of outcome in solid tumors treated with checkpoint-inhibitors.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAntineoplastic AgentsHumansImmunityNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsCheckpoint inhibitorsFDG-PETImmune-PETImmune-related response criteriaImmunotherapyPredictive biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28815334
OpenAlexW2747522459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.