Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815307›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Clinical outcomes after local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care during thyroidectomy and selective neck dissection: a randomized study.

Min-Su Kim, Bo-Hae Kim, Young Eun Han, Dong Woo Nam, J Hun Hah

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min-Su KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Bo-Hae KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Gyeongju, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea.
Young Eun HanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Woo NamDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
J Hun HahThanQ Seoul Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Center, 337 Teheran-Ro Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06150, Korea. jhunhah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5110-012X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2017-R1C1B1008842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although thyroidectomy under local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care (LA-MAC) has been reported, reports of neck dissections beyond level VI under LA-MAC in patients with thyroid cancer are rare. We aimed to analyze clinical data and patient satisfaction levels during thyroidectomy and selective neck dissection by comparing LA-MAC and general anesthesia (GA) in adult patients undergoing these surgeries for thyroid cancer. The 60 enrolled patients comprised 50 patients that underwent thyroidectomy and 10 that underwent selective neck dissection; 30 underwent thyroidectomy (n = 25) or selective neck dissection (n = 5) under LA-MAC and 30 (matched patients) underwent thyroidectomy (n = 25) or selective neck dissection (n = 5) under GA. Complaints of postoperative nausea, vomiting, throat discomfort, and voice changes were significantly fewer in the LA-MAC group than in the GA group. Postoperative pain, odynophagia, dyspnea, and patient satisfaction levels were not significantly different between groups. In the thyroidectomy group, postoperative nausea, vomiting, throat discomfort, and voice changes were less common with LA-MAC, whereas postoperative pain, odynophagia, dyspnea, and patient satisfaction levels were similar for both anesthesia methods. The selective neck dissection group showed no differences between the two anesthesia methods. No postoperative complications were reported in all patients. Our results suggest that LA-MAC can be routinely used for select cases of thyroidectomy and is feasible for selective neck dissection beyond level VI with regard to postoperative discomfort, patient satisfaction levels, and safety. However, further investigations are necessary to clarify these findings.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalNeck DissectionThyroidectomyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativePatient SatisfactionPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainThyroid NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGeneral anesthesiaLocal anesthesiaMonitored anesthesia careThyroidectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.