ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2017
[Aggressive primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas and novel EBV+ entities].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas-an overview of established and novel aspects].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- [Cutaneous lymphomas : Clinical presentation - diagnosis - treatment].Der Pathologe · 2020Review
- [Cutaneous lymphomas : Clinical presentation - diagnosis - treatment].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary cutaneous large B‑cell lymphomas (PCBLT), EBV-positive large B‑cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified (EBV+ DLBCL, NOS), and primary cutaneous intravascular large B‑cell lymphomas (PCIVLBL) are recognized as cutaneous lymphomas with intermediate to poor prognosis. Differentiation from indolent B‑cell lymphomas or other pathologies of the skin can be complex, both clinically and histologically, but vital for the outcome of the patient. The combination of immunotherapy and polychemotherapy regimens, such as R‑CHOP, has led to significant improvements in prognosis, especially in diffuse large B‑cell lymphomas. Therapeutic decisions need to be individually made for each patient, ideally within an interdisciplinary tumor conference. Immunosenescence may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of EBV+ DLBCL, NOS in elderly individuals. Their prognosis is less favorable than that of patients with EBV-negative PCBLT, whereby this has been observed particularly in elderly patients. One third of patients with PCIVLBL progress to systemic disease. The occurrence of nodal manifestation is rarely observed. Symptoms may vary depending on the organ system involved. Currently there are no evidence-based therapy recommendations due to the rarity of the disease. EBV-positive mucocutaneous ulcer is a new provisional category in the current WHO classification for lymphoid neoplasms. It has been segregated from EBV+ DLBCL, NOS due to its self-limiting course and good response to conservative therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.