Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815283›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018

Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse.

Stefano Manodoro, Matteo Frigerio, Alice Cola, Federico Spelzini, Rodolfo Milani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Ten Years of Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Case Series Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Native-tissue prolapse repair: Efficacy and adverse effects of uterosacral ligaments suspension at 10-year follow up.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. LeFort colpocleisis for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano ManodoroASST Monza, U.O. Ginecologia, Ospedale San Gerardo, Via Pergolesi, 33 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy. stefano.manodoro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1837-0806
Matteo FrigerioASST Monza, U.O. Ginecologia, Ospedale San Gerardo, Via Pergolesi, 33 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Alice ColaASST Monza, U.O. Ginecologia, Ospedale San Gerardo, Via Pergolesi, 33 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Federico SpelziniUniversità degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Rodolfo MilaniASST Monza, U.O. Ginecologia, Ospedale San Gerardo, Via Pergolesi, 33 - 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITOspedale Infermi di Rimini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisIdentification of risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence is crucial to provide adequate preoperative counselling and tailor surgical treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify risk factors for recurrence in a large series of patients with POP treated with primary transvaginal native-tissue repair involving high uterosacral ligament suspension.

methodsPostoperative descent of POP-Q stage 2 or higher in any compartment was considered as recurrence. Global recurrence (GR) was defined as any recurrence in any compartment irrespective of the surgical procedures performed during primary prolapse surgery. True recurrence (TR) was defined as recurrence in a compartment repaired during primary prolapse surgery.

resultsOf a total of 533 eligible women, 519 were available for follow-up. Univariate analysis showed that age ≤50 years, premenopausal status, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m

conclusionsThis study confirmed preoperative stage 3 or higher as a risk factor for prolapse recurrence. The study also identified additional risk factors for surgical failure including lack of posterior repair, severe macrosomia, premenopausal status and obesity.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisObesityPelvic Organ ProlapsePlastic Surgery ProceduresPremenopauseRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSuburethral SlingsNative-tissue repairPelvic organ prolapseRecurrenceRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID28815283
OpenAlexW2747550651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.