Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815275›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

Similar failure rate in immediate post-operative weight bearing versus protected weight bearing following meniscal repair on peripheral, vertical meniscal tears.

Bryan Perkins, Kyle R Gronbeck, Ruixian Alexander Yue, Marc A Tompkins

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Effects of and Response to Mechanical Loading on the Knee.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Review
  8. Medial meniscus posterior root repair reduces the extruded meniscus volume during knee flexion with favorable clinical outcome.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan PerkinsSchool of Medicine, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE, 68178, USA.
Kyle R GronbeckMedical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Ruixian Alexander YueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, CARE/Crawley Building, Suite E-870 3230 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
Marc A TompkinsTRIA Orthopaedic Center, 8100 Northland Drive, Bloomington, MN, 55431, USA. tompkinsm@hotmail.com.
Creighton University · USTRIA Orthopaedic Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose and hypothesisPost-operative weight bearing after meniscal repair is a point of debate among physicians. This study sought to evaluate whether patients adhering to an immediate WBAT rehabilitation programme have a higher failure rate compared to those adhering to a more traditional, protected, NWB status following meniscal repair. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in failure between the two groups.

methodsA retrospective review of meniscal repair patients greater than 5 years from surgery was performed for patients receiving meniscal repair treatment. Patients were categorized by post-surgical weight-bearing status, either NWB or WBAT, and then analysed for failure of repair. Failure was defined as re-operation on the torn meniscus. The study controlled for variables including age at surgery, sex, height, weight, and BMI, classification of tear type, acuity of the tear, repair location (medial or lateral), repair location within the meniscus, repair technique, and concomitant procedures.

resultsRe-operations were performed in 61 of 157 patients [38.9%]. There was no difference between weight-bearing groups for failure of meniscus repair (n.s.). The tears were acute vertical tears located in the posterior horn and body. For the 61 patients with re-operation, the average time to re-operation was 2.2 years with 10 [16%] > 5 years from surgery, 17 [28%] 2-5 years from surgery, and 34 [56%] < 2 years from surgery. In isolated meniscal repair patients (n = 62), there was no difference between weight-bearing groups for rate of re-operation (n.s.).

conclusionWeight bearing as tolerated after meniscal repair for peripheral, vertical tears does not result in a higher failure rate than traditional, non-weight bearing over a five-year follow-up period. The clinical relevance is that, based on these data, it may be appropriate to allow weight bearing as tolerated following meniscal repair of peripheral, vertical tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Indexed as

Weight-BearingAdolescentAdultArthroplastyChildFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesMaleMenisci, TibialPostoperative PeriodReoperationRetrospective StudiesRuptureTibial Meniscus InjuriesTreatment FailureMeniscus repairNon-weight bearingPost-operative weight bearingRehabilitationWeight bearing as tolerated

Identifiers

PMID28815275
OpenAlexW2747336483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.