ArticleAcademic pathology
The Case for Laboratory Developed Procedures: Quality and Positive Impact on Patient Care.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient safety and healthcare quality of U.S. laboratory developed tests (LDTs) in the AI/ML era of precision medicine.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Quality analysis of the clinical laboratory literature and its effectiveness on clinical quality improvement: a systematic review.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2023Article
- Molecular diagnostics and the laboratory developed test: A tale of success and the potential impacts of increased regulation.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2023Article
- Quantitative tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory: Regulation and opportunity for validation of laboratory developed tests.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2023Review
- Saliva-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic.Theranostics · 2023Review
- What Every Clinical Virologist Should Know About The VALID Act On Behalf of the Pan-American Society for Clinical Virology Clinical Practice Com.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2021Review
- Rapid Development and Validation of a Novel Laboratory-Derived Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.Delaware journal of public health · 2020Article
- Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests.American journal of clinical pathology · 2019Review
- A Path to Better-Quality mHealth Apps.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- Epigenetic biomarkers: Current strategies and future challenges for their use in the clinical laboratory.Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An explosion of knowledge and technology is revolutionizing medicine and patient care. Novel testing must be brought to the clinic with safety and accuracy, but also in a timely and cost-effective manner, so that patients can benefit and laboratories can offer testing consistent with current guidelines. Under the oversight provided by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments, laboratories have been able to develop and optimize laboratory procedures for use in-house. Quality improvement programs, interlaboratory comparisons, and the ability of laboratories to adjust assays as needed to improve results, utilize new sample types, or incorporate new mutations, information, or technologies are positive aspects of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments oversight of laboratory-developed procedures. Laboratories have a long history of successful service to patients operating under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. A series of detailed clinical examples illustrating the quality and positive impact of laboratory-developed procedures on patient care is provided. These examples also demonstrate how Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments oversight ensures accurate, reliable, and reproducible testing in clinical laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.