ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2017
Anaesthesia during oesophagectomy.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidurals in esophagectomy: end of an era?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The risk analysis of unplanned tracheal intubation after radical esophagectomy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Short-Term Outcomes of Oesophagectomy in a Real-World Scenario from a Tier II City in India.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Combined and intraoperative risk modelling for oesophagectomy: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Preoperative risk modelling for oesophagectomy: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- Application of standardized hemodynamic protocols within enhanced recovery after surgery programs to improve outcomes associated with anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
- Recent progress in perioperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2018Review
- Effect of pneumoperitoneum and steep reverse-Trendelenburg position on mean systemic filling pressure, venous return, and microcirculation during esophagectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, we will provide an overview of the current state of the art of perioperative practices for open and laparoscopic oesophagus surgery from the anaesthetist's perspective. Morbidity and mortality after oesophagectomy is still high despite multidisciplinary and enhanced recovery pathways showing promising results. The anaesthetist has an important role in the complex care of the oesophageal cancer patient. Minimizing unnecessary fluid administration, adequate pain management, hypotension, and protective lung ventilation are examples of proven strategies that can improve outcome after this high-risk surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.