Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815034›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2017

Compliance with the faecal calprotectin test in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Chloé Maréchal, Isabelle Aimone-Gastin, Cédric Baumann, Bastien Dirrenberger, Jean-Louis Guéant, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A novel diagnostic serum protein signature for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Early subclinical stages of the inflammatory bowel diseases: insights from human and animal studies.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Faecal calprotectin in primary care: is its current use supported by the evidence?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Objective Disease Monitoring Strategies from a Tertiary Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center in Hungary.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chloé MaréchalINSERM U954, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
Isabelle Aimone-GastinDepartment of Biochemistry, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
Cédric BaumannPARC Clinical Research Support Facility, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
Bastien DirrenbergerINSERM U954, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
Jean-Louis GuéantINSERM U954, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
Laurent Peyrin-BirouletINSERM U954, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated, for the first time, levels of compliance with faecal calprotectin test in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

methodsAll consecutive adult inflammatory bowel disease patients having been prescribed an faecal calprotectin test between December 2014-July 2015 were included. At their next visit to the hospital, patients had to return a stool sample for the faecal calprotectin test and answer a simple questionnaire: 'Have you brought a stool sample? If not, why not? If so, did you encounter any difficulties when collecting the sample? Were you aware of faecal calprotectin before being asked to take the test?'.

resultsOne hundred and one patients were included (50 men; 77 patients with Crohn's disease). The range age was 40 years (19-68). Eighty-nine patients were being treated with infliximab, 10 were on vedolizumab, and two were not being treated with a biologic. Thirty-seven patients (35%) had performed the faecal calprotectin test. Eighty-one patients (80%) had not been aware of faecal calprotectin before being asked to take the test. Of the 64 patients who did not take the test, the prime reasons for non-compliance were forgetfulness (

conclusionOnly one-third of the patients performed the faecal calprotectin test. The main reason for non-compliance was forgetfulness. Our present results emphasise the need for better patient education on the importance of complying with faecal calprotectin testing and the future of faecal calprotectin testing at home.

Indexed as

compliancefaecal calprotectinInflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID28815034
PMCPMC5548356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.