Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28815020›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2017

Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: a systematic review.

Marina de Paula Andres, Giuliano Moysés Borrelli, Mauricio Simões Abrão

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina de Paula AndresEndometriosis Section, Gynecology Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Giuliano Moysés BorrelliEndometriosis Section, Gynecology Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mauricio Simões AbrãoEndometriosis Section, Gynecology Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-3010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed gynecologic surgeries, mainly for uterine myomas, abnormal uterine bleeding, and prolapses. It can be performed through several routes, each of which has its advantages and disadvantages. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate recent advances in surgical outcomes of benign total hysterectomies by any route: vaginal (VH), laparoscopic (LH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal (LAVH), single-port (SP), and robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RH). The search was applied to the PubMed electronic database by using keywords "hysterectomy" and "uterine benign disease", "adenomyosis", and "myoma". Prospective and randomized trials of the last 3 years were included. Nine studies were selected and showed that VH was superior to LH, LAVH, and RH in terms of hospital stay and operation time and had the same complication rate and lower costs. SP hysterectomy had no clear advantages over VH or conventional LH.

Indexed as

HysterectomyUterine benign diseasesUterine myoma

Identifiers

PMID28815020
PMCPMC5539852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.