Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814818›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Multigenerational effects of copper nanomaterials (CuONMs) are different of those of CuCl

Rita C Bicho, Fátima C F Santos, Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand, Mónica J B Amorim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CeOPlant molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stage-, sex- and tissue-related changes in HEcotoxicology (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita C BichoDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Fátima C F SantosDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Janeck J Scott-FordsmandDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsovej 25, PO BOX 314, DK-8600, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Mónica J B AmorimDepartamento de Biologia & CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. mjamorim@ua.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-8137-3295
University of Aveiro · PTAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomaterials (NMs) are recommended to be tested in longer term exposures. Multigenerational (MG) studies are scarce and particularly important because effects can be transferred to the next generation. The current risk assessment framework does not include MG effects and this is a caveat for persistent materials. Here, the effects of copper NMs (CuONMs) and copper salt (CuCl

Indexed as

AnimalsCopperNanostructuresOligochaetaReproductionRisk AssessmentSoilSoil PollutantsTime FactorsToxicity TestsCoppercupric chlorideSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID28814818
PMCPMC5559477
OpenAlexW2742765831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.