Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Targeted insertion of an anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody transgene into the GGTA1 locus in pigs using FokI-dCas9.

Mark B Nottle, Evelyn J Salvaris, Nella Fisicaro, Stephen McIlfatrick, Ivan Vassiliev, Wayne J Hawthorne, Philip J O'Connell, Jamie L Brady, Andrew M Lew, Peter J Cowan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Activation of immune signals during organ transplantation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2021
    Review
  9. CRISPR/Cas Technology in Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Progress towards xenogenic tolerance.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION: WILL XENOTRANSPLANTATION BE THE ANSWER TO THE DONOR ORGAN SHORTAGE?Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mark B NottleRobinson Research Institute & Adelaide School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Evelyn J SalvarisImmunology Research Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nella FisicaroImmunology Research Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen McIlfatrickRobinson Research Institute & Adelaide School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Ivan VassilievRobinson Research Institute & Adelaide School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Wayne J HawthorneWestmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Philip J O'ConnellWestmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jamie L BradyWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew M LewWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter J CowanImmunology Research Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. peter.cowan@svha.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9016-4954
The University of Adelaide · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenotransplantation from pigs has been advocated as a solution to the perennial shortage of donated human organs and tissues. CRISPR/Cas9 has facilitated the silencing of genes in donor pigs that contribute to xenograft rejection. However, the generation of modified pigs using second-generation nucleases with much lower off-target mutation rates than Cas9, such as FokI-dCas9, has not been reported. Furthermore, there have been no reports on the use of CRISPR to knock protective transgenes into detrimental porcine genes. In this study, we used FokI-dCas9 with two guide RNAs to integrate a 7.1 kilobase pair transgene into exon 9 of the GGTA1 gene in porcine fetal fibroblasts. The modified cells lacked expression of the αGal xenoantigen, and secreted an anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody encoded by the transgene. PCR and sequencing revealed precise integration of the transgene into one allele of GGTA1, and a small deletion in the second allele. The cells were used for somatic cell nuclear transfer to generate healthy male knock-in piglets, which did not express αGal and which contained anti-CD2 in their serum. We have therefore developed a versatile high-fidelity system for knocking transgenes into the pig genome for xenotransplantation purposes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAntibodies, MonoclonalCD2 AntigensCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificFemaleFibroblastsGalactosyltransferasesGene Knock-In TechniquesGene TargetingHumansMaleNuclear Transfer TechniquesPregnancyReproducibility of Resultsalpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase 1, porcineAntibodies, MonoclonalCD2 AntigensCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specificendodeoxyribonuclease FokIGalactosyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID28814758
PMCPMC5559588
OpenAlexW2744410015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.