Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814718›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Adaptive and non-adaptive divergence in a common landscape.

Joost A M Raeymaekers, Anurag Chaturvedi, Pascal I Hablützel, Io Verdonck, Bart Hellemans, Gregory E Maes, Luc De Meester, Filip A M Volckaert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Joost A M RaeymaekersLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. joostraeymaekers@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2732-7495
Anurag ChaturvediLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Pascal I HablützelLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-4994
Io VerdonckLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart HellemansLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Gregory E MaesLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-7321
Luc De MeesterLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Filip A M VolckaertLaboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BECenter for Human Genetics · USFlanders Marine Institute · BENord University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species in a common landscape often face similar selective environments. The capacity of organisms to adapt to these environments may be largely species specific. Quantifying shared and unique adaptive responses across species within landscapes may thus improve our understanding of landscape-moderated biodiversity patterns. Here we test to what extent populations of two coexisting and phylogenetically related fishes-three-spined and nine-spined stickleback-differ in the strength and nature of neutral and adaptive divergence along a salinity gradient. Phenotypic differentiation, neutral genetic differentiation and genomic signatures of adaptation are stronger in the three-spined stickleback. Yet, both species show substantial phenotypic parallelism. In contrast, genomic signatures of adaptation involve different genomic regions, and are thus non-parallel. The relative contribution of spatial and environmental drivers of population divergence in each species reflects different strategies for persistence in the same landscape. These results provide insight in the mechanisms underlying variation in evolutionary versatility and ecological success among species within landscapes.The three-spined stickleback is a model species for the study of adaptive divergence. Here, Raeymaekers et al. compare how the three-spined stickleback and its relative the nine-spined stickleback vary at the phenotypic and genomic levels in response to the same spatial and environmental drivers.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEnvironmentAnimalsBiodiversityGenomePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSalinitySmegmamorphaSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID28814718
PMCPMC5559485
OpenAlexW2742650389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.