ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2017
N
Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Silicon: A valuable soil element for improving plant growth and COJournal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Enhanced weathering in the US Corn Belt delivers carbon removal with agronomic benefits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Functional stasis and changing habitat preferences among mammalian communities from the PETM of the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming.Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2024Article
- Constraining the Capacity of Global Croplands to COACS earth & space chemistry · 2023Review
- The innovation of the symbiosome has enhanced the evolutionary stability of nitrogen fixation in legumes.The New phytologist · 2022Article
- Climate windows of opportunity for plant expansion during the Phanerozoic.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Fossil papilionoids of the Bowdichia clade (Leguminosae) from the Paleogene of North America.American journal of botany · 2022Article
- Legume-microbiome interactions unlock mineral nutrients in regrowing tropical forests.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Article
- The efficiency paradox: How wasteful competitors forge thrifty ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Symbiotic N fixation is sufficient to support net aboveground biomass accumulation in a humid tropical forest.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Co-Benefits of Wollastonite Weathering in Agriculture: COACS omega · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fossil and phylogenetic evidence indicates legume-rich modern tropical forests replaced Late Cretaceous palm-dominated tropical forests across four continents during the early Cenozoic (58-42 Ma). Tropical legume trees can transform ecosystems via their ability to fix dinitrogen (N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.